Imagine a society that completely disregards the rule of law. Which of the following would be surprising to find in such a society? The king has no written set of rules to follow. The society is orderly and free of chaos. There is no legislative or judicial body to enforce the law. The society fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens. Charlie was convicted by the highest court in Oregon and sent to prison. Charlie says that the conviction should be overturned and wants the case reviewed again. To which higher court can Charlie request this review? State appeals court State supreme court U.S. Court of Appeals U.S. Supreme Court Charles Schenck, a U.S. citizen, was responsible for printing and distributing leaflets that explained why he was against the draft (required military service) during World War I. He was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917, a federal law that outlawed any action that got in the way of military operations. Charles believed that the law in question violated his right to free speech. In which court would this case be tried, and why? A state court because it involved violation of criminal law. The Supreme Court of the United States because it involved constitutional law. A county civil court because it involved violation of civil liberties. A military tribunal because the matter involved prospective military draftees.
there is three questions
What I think: 1. The society is orderly and free of chaos. 2. U.S. Supreme Court 3. The Supreme Court of the United States because it involved constitutional law.
yes that right
im sorry i forgot you needed help
Everything looks right so far
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!