Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 20 Online
BLUEFACE123:

Which of these statements BEST explains why the decision made in the “Dred Scott” case nullified the Compromise of 1850 and “popular sovereignty”?

TETSXPREME:

Welcome To Questioncove! Where are the statements?

BLUEFACE123:

Which of these statements BEST explains why the decision made in the “Dred Scott” case nullified the Compromise of 1850 and “popular sovereignty”? answer choices A state has the right to secede if the federal government tried to abolish slavery there. Slaves were considered property and federal government could not disallow slavery in any territory. African-Americans could not be considered citizens therefore no state could allow them to vote. Only the Supreme Court could determine whether a state could allow slavery not the Legislative branch.

TETSXPREME:

Well what do you think it is?

BLUEFACE123:

Slaves were considered property and federal government could not disallow slavery in any territory.

xxDeppressionxx:

ion about that one what do you think tet?

xxDeppressionxx:

are they right

BLUEFACE123:

Its the one i said is thye correct answer

xxDeppressionxx:

Hang on im thinking about this.

TETSXPREME:

Yea i believe that is correcto

xxDeppressionxx:

aight then its correct if it says it is lol

RodWav3:

yea i agree

BLUEFACE123:

yea ok

xxDeppressionxx:

close this please if you are done with the question

RodWav3:

@xxdeppressionxx wrote:
close this please if you are done with the question
agreed

BLUEFACE123:

i will

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!