Ask your own question, for FREE!
QuestionCove Feedback 7 Online
1st4r:

If someone does a kind deed but has a selfish motive, does that impact the goodness of the deed?

forgetmylife:

I would say yes the act is considered less altruistic and more self-serving

GraceInAction:

idk like that's a tough one because it just depends how you look at it. like one hand, the act itself helping someone or doing something good like still happens and than can have a positive impact. but on the other hand if the person is motivated by selfish reasons it just kind of raises the questions about their true intentions

Shadow:

If a billionaire saves a child's life by paying for their surgery just for publicity, that is still a good thing. The child is alive because of it. What is affected is the sense of that person we will have when we learn that is was selfishly motivated. We don't consider that person to be 'good,' even though the action and its result was good for the child. So those aren't mutually exclusive. A selfish motive doesn't diminish the deed itself, but it does diminish the perception of the person who did the deed.

ykbatman:

@shadow wrote:
If a billionaire saves a child's life by paying for their surgery just for publicity, that is still a good thing. The child is alive because of it. What is affected is the sense of that person we will have when we learn that is was selfishly motivated. We don't consider that person to be 'good,' even though the action and its result was good for the child. So those aren't mutually exclusive. A selfish motive doesn't diminish the deed itself, but it does diminish the perception of the person who did the deed.
thats probably the best answer you could possibly get

1st4r:

@ykbatman wrote:
@shadow wrote:
If a billionaire saves a child's life by paying for their surgery just for publicity, that is still a good thing. The child is alive because of it. What is affected is the sense of that person we will have when we learn that is was selfishly motivated. We don't consider that person to be 'good,' even though the action and its result was good for the child. So those aren't mutually exclusive. A selfish motive doesn't diminish the deed itself, but it does diminish the perception of the person who did the deed.
thats probably the best answer you could possibly get
yh yh true

GoatyGoat:

It kinda depends on how they really do it

AcornTheNut:

i'd say no because if you gave someone 5 dollars for nothing in return, then thats 100% nice. Even if you only gave the person 5 dollars because you wanted to look good in front of the gang, it doesn't take away the kindness that was given to that person.. you just have to lock-in...

1st4r:

@acornthenut wrote:
i'd say no because if you gave someone 5 dollars for nothing in return, then thats 100% nice. Even if you only gave the person 5 dollars because you wanted to look good in front of the gang, it doesn't take away the kindness that was given to that person.. you just have to lock-in...
mmm ok ty for tht

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
laylasnii13: Who wanna write or make a song with me???
3 hours ago 0 Replies 0 Medals
kaelynw: art igg
2 hours ago 9 Replies 1 Medal
XShawtyX: Art
21 hours ago 6 Replies 0 Medals
Nina001: teach me how to draw or just tell me the basics
23 hours ago 2 Replies 1 Medal
XShawtyX: We doing another drawing gimme ideas to add to this
1 day ago 9 Replies 1 Medal
RAVEN69: What is x 3+y 3+z 3=k
1 day ago 20 Replies 1 Medal
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!