if a differential equations solution divides by x^2 and the initial condition is a point where x=0, what do you do? (problem: dy/dx=xyy or dy/dx=xy^2)
initial condition is (0,-2)
You can use separation by variables here and then integrate. Once you have y after integration, you can use the initial condition.
i did that, but my solution is y=(-2/x^2)+2 which doesnt technically do through the initial condition
i think its a vertical asymptote which... definitely isint the point XD
There's nothing wrong with that equation. After you put it into separable form and solve, you should get,\[\frac{x^2y}{2}+cy+1=0\]Initial condition,\[0-2c+1=0 \rightarrow c=\frac{1}{2}\]
You can then factor out y and rearrange into the form y=y(x).
brb
i got c=2?
When you separated the variable and tried to get y by itself did you include c and also multiply the y by it?
.... -.-
ima try that, how about: y'=1+yy
You can do that problem the same way. I look at it as y' is dy/dx and then separate variables. Make sure when you do though, that the 1 goes with the y^2. So move the entire quantity.
dang, the small things get by me... that should be something like arctany=x+c? so tan(x+c)=y?
that explains why my condition is in radians
Yes.
alright... major confusion... \[y'=(e ^{x-y})\div(1+e ^{x})\]
You want to solve that?
sadly ><
Just pull out the e^(-y) and it becomes separable ;)
asoghaqoeraifoiafauirfhlanihusdfvnnfldanufd
\[e^ydy=\frac{e^x}{1+e^x}dx\]
differential equations are gay -.-
lol
dont tell me any more!!!
tell you what? answers?
yeah.. dont tell me any more lol
no worries :D
I think you have the best icon...if that helps...
hahahaha it was annoyingly hard to make XD
i have a pretty good feeling that your icon is not you... though there is a significant chance that i am wrong given by the circumstances
it could be me, since i look like that
lol, how did your frigging doughnut go?
pretty good, i have a way of doing things when i need help: use the first sentence or line of the help, fail a thousand times before i use the second, so on and so forth. so i used quite a bit, but not all of your help in the process of doing the assignment, and in the end i was flowing through it quite nicely, i compared my results to yours and they were identical, i then compared my results to the assignment and apparently the last couple steps, which i had done by hand, i could take the integral with a calculator... and then later he gave us the hand written answer, so i felt proud that i did it without a calculator... but yeah your help is insanely apreciated
alright im stuck at e^y=ln(1+e^x)+c initial condition is (0,1)
Is that y supposed to be y' (y-prime)?
nope, thats my solution
to the above equation
oh..
Yeah. You're right. Leave it like that too.
but i need to find c
Oh, just plug your numbers in.
\[e=\ln 2 +c \rightarrow c = e- \ln 2\]
any way to do that without a calc?
You mean simplify?
No.
What's wrong with Euler's number? :p
ah god its 1... can you check these real quick?
Check what?
Do you ever sleep?
not too much anymore lol
I need paper...I've run out...hang on...
but all my work is shown?
I get something different for the first one. Just go to bed and I'll look at it and scan and you can look at it when you get up.
do i have to multiply the c by 2 aswell?
I'll do it here:
my answer doesnt make sense anyways... when i find y' its all weird and quotienty
\[\frac{dy}{dx}=xy^2 \rightarrow y^{-2}dy = x dx \rightarrow -y^{-1}=x+c\]
Your boundary condition is (0,-2), so
x+c or (1/2)xx+c?
\[-2^{-1}=0+c \rightarrow c=-\frac{1}{2}\]
So\[y^{-1}+x=\frac{1}{2} \rightarrow 2+2xy=y \rightarrow y(1-2x)=2 \rightarrow y=\frac{2}{1-2x}\]
waitttt the integral of xdx is (1/2)xx+c though!
Oh crap, I forgot the frigging x. Sorry Arman.
nah dont be sorry, i should hit the sheets tho, i'll probably have more questions tomorrow lol
I still get a different answer to you.
basic differential equations (like these) arent usually part of calc II are they?
Yours is close. I'll work through them - they won't take long - and scan and you can read it in the morning.
different answer?
I'm not sure about the American system.
y=2/(1-x^2)
did you use (0,-2) for the initial whatever?
pellet, I wrote it wrong on my paper. I wrote (0,2). SORRY AGAIN :'(
NOW I get what you got.
>< nah man i hate when ppl tell me sorry
lol XD
my calc teacher, this morning, was like "oh flutter..." *covers mouth*... *whole class starts laughing caus we hear him say pellet sometimes but never the f word so it meant he was really screwed over XD
lol, it's great when that happens. I got the same results as you for the other two. The *only* thing I would do differently is leave \[e-\log 2\]as is, and not use a numerical approximation (in the last one).
thats probably better in the math world, where you need to be precise
Yeah, exactly.
is that prefered in college?
preferred*
Absolutely. You'd only use a numerical approximation for the time you actually need to extract a number. Other than that, we leave it because we may want to do further mathematics on it and we lose information/exactness if we start approximating beforehand.
just like the AP exams lol. i think i asked you before but what are the remaining major math courses after differential eqas and linear algebra (when i say top i mean like... there should be less than 3 "top" ones)
?
Yeah, I really don't know. Your system is different to the system in UK, Australia and Canada. We don't break mathematics up into sections like calculus and then apply a skill level to it. We apply a skill level to ALL of mathematics at particular points and you learn EVERYTHING at a particular level.
oh... well what are the chances that i can attain a college grad level (in math) of mathematical understanding in the next year?
given the rate that i covered calc 1 and 2 within 1.5 months
I'd say you're pretty good.
College grad level in calculus...is that what you're asking?
You have to cover calculus of a complex variable as well. There's also tensor calculus.
not just calculus, but all mathematics, can i attain that sort of knowledge, about 4 or more years of college math in the next 9 months?
complex variable wont be too hard, what is tensor calc??
It *might* take a little longer ;p
They're devices we use to extend scalars, vectors and matrices to higher dimensions.
They're very useful.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!