Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 19 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

im stumped calculus circumference arc. how come we cant use integral C(x)dx to find surfacea area. C(x) is the circumference so its 2pi*r , and dx is the thickness. so why isnt surface area integral 2pi * r * dx instead it is integral 2pi y sqrt ( 1 + dy/dx^2)dx

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You're trying to compute the area of a circle?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so say you have f(x)>0 in the first quadrant

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im doing the formula for surface area , made by revolving a curve about an axis .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

generated i should say

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't understand that second integral you wrote.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh wait, yes I do.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

integral 2pi * f(x) sqrt ( 1 + f ' (x) ^2 ) dx

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Polpak, when you get finished can you assist me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so my question is , why cant we just use the easier formula integral 2pi f(x) dx

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what r u guys parternes?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you rotating around the x axis?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes in this case

OpenStudy (anonymous):

say y = x^2 from 0 to 2 , but trying to find surfacea area

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But you still need to account for the way f(x) is changing over your dx

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You would be fine if it were flat washers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But along the top edge there can be a lot of slopes that will change the area of the final surface.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats true but

OpenStudy (anonymous):

when you go to zero, dont they approach 2pi * r , the height

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, but they still have an angle.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You're ok computing the volume that way

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but not the surface area.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

actually its not volume

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it would be the surface of a cylinder type figure, i guess, not sure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for example here, we have using my way integral 2pi x^2 dx from 0 to 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

See you're way makes the assumption that along the top edge for a tiny dx, that the length of the line of the function = dx.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the books way is integral 2pi x^2 sqrt ( 1 + (2x)^2) dx

OpenStudy (anonymous):

come back

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but it doesn't. The length of the line for a small dx is proportional the the square root of the square of dy^2 + dx^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

err I said that wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But you see what I mean.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We are ok with the area under the curve assuming that as we take smaller and smaller values for dx, the area approaches f(x) * dx

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But for the line integral it doesn't come close

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah, why is that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let me see if I can explain.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You there?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://www.twiddla.com/529576

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!