Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

find dy/dx for y=integral(arctan)tdt from (1/x,4x)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[y = \int\limits_{} \tan^{-1}(t) dt\] is this the equation?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes but it is a definite integral 1/x to 4x

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we might have to convert this to a trig of "u"... maybe. I dont know any derivatives that become an arctan...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if we let u = tan^-1(t) then; t = tan(u) ; dt = sec^2(u) du which gives us... [S] u sec^2(u) du ; to solve

OpenStudy (amistre64):

does that make sense so far?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i wonder if we can decompose this......

OpenStudy (amistre64):

I dont see any easy ways of doing this :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think i'm just making it more difficult than it needs to be in some way

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do you understand piecewise functions?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

is there an answer that you can chaeck against?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i know if piecewise functions; but havenet come across a way to integrate them

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mmk and there isn't an answer to check :/ thanks for trying though!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

.-. I don't think that's right amistre though I didn't try it myself lol >_<

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wh are you letting tan^-1(t) = u? ._.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

this is prolly an integration by parts method; but I dont know much about when it goes into multiple integration by parts :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

becasue there is no function that derives down to a tan^-1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

it is equivalent to: [S] u sec^2(u) du tho.... and thats doable somehow

OpenStudy (anonymous):

integration by parts is something like this:\[\int\limits f'gdx = fg - \int\limits fg'dx\] where f' = sec^2(u) and g = u then find f and g' and plug it in the equation ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol I got you amistre :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

int by parts is still a mystery to me for some functions :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it's alright ^_^ all you have to do is find f and g' and then plug it in the equation, with that, you have solved the problem. g' = 1 and f = tan x then you'll get : \[\int\limits f'gdx = (\sec^2(u))(u) - \int\limits \tan(u) du\] then just find the integral lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i usually do a table like this: | v up ----------- u dn | sec^2 ----------- +u | tan ----------- -1 | ?? ---------- +0 | N/A ---------- And so I get for the integral: u tan(u) - 1(????)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits f'gdx = (\sec^2(u))(u) + \ln|\cos(u)| + c\] I hope I'm right, I just followed your given lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

O_O what kind of table is THAT LOL

OpenStudy (amistre64):

its an integration by parts table; but it lines everything up as tho it was multiple integration by parts :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

.-. why so complicated? LOL

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you can do it my way :) much easier ^_^

OpenStudy (amistre64):

its easier when doing multiple integration by parts; which is all the table amounts to. You shift between + and - your u derives down and your v suits up.... its the same process :) just a different format to keep everything in line :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

>_< lol, I've learned something new today! thank you :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

:) all I need is an integral for tan(u) and I got it solved lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the table of integration says: tan(x) ints to ln(sec(x)) cool :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

u tan(u) - ln(sec(u))

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm: \[\tan x = \frac{sinx}{cosx}\] let u = cos x and du = -sinx and solve lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we re-stitute for u and get: tan^-1(t) tan(tan^-1(t)) - tan(tan^-1(t))

OpenStudy (anonymous):

.-.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

well...... ln(sec(tan^-1(t))) lol got excited ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not convinced with the sec u amistre :(

OpenStudy (amistre64):

can always try to derive it back ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

tan x = sinx/cosx integrating that will give you ln|cosx|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

>_<lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\tan ^{-1}t=u, tanu = t\] \[dt=\sec ^{2}u du=(1 + \tan ^{2}u)d u\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

._.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

students have faced such a question last semester, thankfully I wasn't there lol , anyhow, thanks for your time amistre and uzma ^_^ but I gotta study communications , take care both :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:) you too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits_{?}^{?}\tan ^{-1}u=\int\limits_{?}^{?}1.\tan ^{-1}u\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

integrating by parts \[\tan ^{-1}u.u-\int\limits_{?}^{?}u.1/(1+u ^{2})d u\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[utan ^{-1}u -2 \int\limits_{?}^{?}2u/(1+u ^{2})\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if I did it right; mine derives back to tan^-1(t)....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[utan ^{-1}u - 2 \ln (1+u ^{2})\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i used integration by parts method, not substitution

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[D[\tan^{-1}(t).\tan(\tan^{-1}(t)) - \ln(\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)))]\] \[\frac{\tan^{-1}(t)\sec^2(\tan^{-1}(t))}{t^2 +1}+\frac{\tan(\tan^{-1}(t))}{t^2+1}- \frac{\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)).\tan(\tan^{-1}(t))}{\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)).(t^2+1)}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{\tan(\tan^{-1}(t)).\sec^2 (\tan^{-1}(t)).\sec(\tan^{-1}(t))+\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)).\tan(\tan^{-1}(t))-\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)).\tan(\tan^{-1}(t))}{\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)).(t^2+1)}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

all that work and it cuts it short lol...; that last part is zeros the middle part to get:\[\frac{\tan^{-1}(t).\sec^2(\tan^{-1}(t)).\sec(\tan^{-1}())}{\sec(\tan^{-1}(t)).(t^2+1)}\] had to fix a typo in that second round... it aint a tan(tan^-1(t)))

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so the result?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{\tan^{-1}(t).\sec(^2(\tan^{-1}(t))}{t^2+1}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n this is what u wanted?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i guess i should terminate at Tan^(-1)t?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

since t^2+2 = sec^2(a) = sec^2(tan^-1(t)); those cancel and we are left with.. tan^-1(t)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

...since t^2 + 1.....typoed it :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmmmm,right :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

did u check mine?is it wrong?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i had enough trouble proofing mine lol...my computer is bogging with all thisequation editor stuff....lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yup...hats off to ur patience :P

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!