Would the following fraction be considered to be fully simplified? x^4-2x^3-5x^2-18x-36 ----------------------------- x^5-5x^4+6x^3+8x^2-40x+48
This was the result I got when multiplying two fractions. I know my multiplication was correct.
No.
Why?
I'm guessing you'd have to solve the top and the bottom separately for it to be simplified.
No, there is no solving. My instructions are to simplify completely. This is where I am in the problem. Does that mean I need to combine all of the x's and the whole numbers in front of them, and then subtract the smaller total from the larger total, and get an x with a single variable on whatever side of the equation that happens to be?
Or just the -36/48 part...
I believe its just the -36/48 part.
Okay yea, so then that would make the final answer: \[x^4-2x^3-5x^2-18x-3 \] ------------------------ \[x^5-5x^4+6x^3+8x^2-40x+12\]
?
Lost me their, man. I'm only in 8th grade.
Eh... Does that look completely simplified to you then?
No. Doesn't look simplified. I would just try out all the options and see which one does look like its in its final "simplified" form...
yo no entiendo las cosas que este chico esta preguntando me...
Okay, then how about the original question... See what you can come up with... \[(x^2-2x+4)/(x^2-5x+6)\div(x^2-9)/(x^3+8)\]
K.
Darn it. I messed it up. I can't solve that right now. I'm studying at the same time I do this.
Sorry man. You're on your own until someone with the proper knowledge can help you. :/
Si no sabes cómo hacerlo, ¿por qué estás tratando de ayudar?
Is this the original expression \[{x^2-2x+4 \over x^2-5x+6}\div {x^2-9 \over x^3+8}?\]
yes
At the very top is what I got from long multiplication. I just need to know if that form is correctly simplified since the exponents on the variables aren't all the same, or if I have to simplify those variables with the same exponents if possible.
It does not look difficult at all. Just a minute.
such as -2x^3/6x^3, would you simplify that to x^3/3x^3?
I forgot the negative in that answer, sorry
Are you sure it's division, not multiplication?
Absolutely positive
I flipped the fraction on the right side to turn the division sign into a multiplication sign.
No problem. \[={x^2-2x+4 \over (x-3)(x-2)}.{(x+2)(x^2-2x+4) \over (x-3)(x+3)}\] \[{(x^2-2x+4)^2(x+2) \over (x-3)^2(x+3)(x-2)}\] For me, this is the best simplification.
Ahhh, I got on here yesterday to ask about factoring it and someone told me not to do that.
But you know this type of question usually involve some cancellation, which would be the case if it was a multiplication.
But I get why you did it. It IS more simple in factored form.
From what I remember of my first attempt at factoring it, all of the factored trinomials did not cancel.
I have the work around here, just one secon.
Yeah, nothing can be cancelled. Is this a question from your teacher or from the book?
It is a study guide for my final exam for college algebra. There are no answers given, so I want to make sure I have the idea down.
I see. Good luck. I'll be around of you have any questions that I have answers for.
But in that form you gave, couldn't you factor it further?
Nope.
but x^2-2x+4 would be (x-2)(x-2) wouldn't it?
Wait no, it won't work that way.
But I get what you are saying. Factoring would be the simplest way to completely simplify a problem with two fractions and any kind of operation.
Well there is one thing you could do to the denominator. The denominator can be written as (x^2-9)(x-3)(x-2)
Actually, (x^2-2x+4)/1 would cross cancel with 1/(x+2)(x^2-2x+4) which is the result of x^3+8, right?
But what I wrote before is more simplified than this, I would say.
Yes, and I appreciate the help very much, I will let you move on to other things, but you helped me figure something out :D
You're welcome, but you can't cancel them. :)
if there was multiplication in the center you could though, right?
Yeah.
You could cancel many things actually.
Like this: \[(x^2-2x+4) * (1)\] \[(1) (x+2)(x^2-2x+4)\]
eh, everything after the 1 is on the right side of that problem. Cant figure out how to like up the equation things
It would seem like, in that scenario, you would have 1/1 * 1/(x+2)
I don't get it :)
Sorry, try it this way: 1 5 - * - 5 1
Yeah this is 1.
I am applying that principle to the fractions. You helped me figure it out though :D Thank you again!
:)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!