Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
l'hopital's rule.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no cant use that.....
OpenStudy (anonymous):
is the answer 2/3?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
not sure if its 2/3 or zero?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i doubt that. i think it should be zero. the first terms are irrelevant since they are linear and the rest is exponential. if we simply erase the first terms you get \[(\frac{2}{3})^n\]which certainly goes to zero. of course this is not a proof.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
The answer is 0I used Mathematica to get the answer. I dont know how to get there though
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yes the wolfram is also showing zero but I dont know how to get there
OpenStudy (anonymous):
hey should I use??? |a(n) - 0 | < epsilon ???
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i still don't know why l'hopital does not apply. take the derivative once, get \[\frac{2+2^nln(2)}{3+3^nln(3)}\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I know we can use it but its analysis course, so I have to find the limit without l'hopital rule
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
do it again, get
\[\frac{2^n (ln(2))^2}{3^n (ln(3))^2}\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ooh sorry.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
any ideas you have....??? but now I m sure its 0. so I m half way I think