Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

partial fractions fail

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok i have 1/ (x (x^2-4)) = A/ x + (bx+c) / (x^2-4)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im breaking the rule of irreducible factoring, but it still works

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

you can factor x^2-4 = (x-2)(x+2)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i know

myininaya (myininaya):

i don't think that will always work

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\frac{1}{x(x-2)(x+2)}=\frac{A}{x}+\frac{B}{x+2}+\frac{C}{x-2}\]\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

myin, can you think of a counterexample

myininaya (myininaya):

i will think one sec

OpenStudy (anonymous):

here is another example int ( 1/ ( x ( x^2 - 15))

OpenStudy (anonymous):

here we have reducible over reals, irreducible over rationals (integers)

myininaya (myininaya):

so this form only right? where you have 1/(a*(x^2-b))

myininaya (myininaya):

i mean that a is an x

myininaya (myininaya):

i mean you want me to find a counterexample of that form?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right,

OpenStudy (anonymous):

( 1/ ( x ( x^2 - 15)) = A / x + (bx + c) / (x^2 - 15)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

in general 1 / [(x-a)^n (x^2+bx+c)^n] = A1/(x-a) + A2/ ( x-a)^2 + ... An/(x-a)^n + (B1x+C1)/ (x^2+bx+c) + (B2x + C2) / (x^2+bx+c)^2 + ... + (Bn x + Cn ) / (x^2+bx+c)^n

myininaya (myininaya):

i guess you may be right

myininaya (myininaya):

still thinking

OpenStudy (anonymous):

see my book keeps saying "irreducible"

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

yes it works A = -1/b B = 1/b

OpenStudy (anonymous):

one must use quadratics that are irreducible, but im finding that is not the case

OpenStudy (anonymous):

now i remember what a pain this is. i got A = -1/4

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right we have 1/ (x (x^2-4)) = (-1/4) / x + (1/4 * x ) / (x^2 - 4)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1/ (x (x^2-4)) = (-1/4) / x + (1/4 * x + 0 ) / (x^2 - 4)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B=C and A+B+C=0 -1/4+2B=0 making B = 1/8

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but it is late and i could have made a mistake

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

no you do not always have to reduce quadratics, as long as there is a product in denominator

OpenStudy (anonymous):

satellite, you did it out the normal way, we have same solution though

OpenStudy (anonymous):

whew. glad to know i can still solve a simple system

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i was just making a point, you can relax the rule about quadratics being irreducible

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sure if you use complex you can even do it with \[x^2+1\] and even use it to integrate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right but i mean , sometimes you have, say this case int 1 / ( x ( x^2 - 15)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int \frac{1}{x^2+1} dx\] can use partial fractions.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

technically, yes over the complex numbers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think the issue boils down, what field you are restricting yourself to

OpenStudy (anonymous):

restricting to rationals , to reals, or to complex

OpenStudy (anonymous):

myinanay, are you in agrement?

myininaya (myininaya):

yes i just made a proof lol i will scan it

myininaya (myininaya):

for when we were talking about 1/[x(x^2-a)] form sorry i doubted you cantorset :)

myininaya (myininaya):

its alittle sloppy and i wanted it on one page so after i got to the end of the page i went back up and drew a square to finish showing the combination of fractions from i reduced the polynomial x^2-a would still give you the same combination of frations if you did not reduce

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok im back

myininaya (myininaya):

can you read it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so you got the same answer doing it both ways?

myininaya (myininaya):

right! so since we proved we can make it a theorem lol

myininaya (myininaya):

it is no longer a conjunction to us

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how do you know they are equal though?

myininaya (myininaya):

do you in the square i combined the fractions?

myininaya (myininaya):

from the reduced way

myininaya (myininaya):

it came out to be the same as the non reduced way

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i see

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you can combine the last two fractions ,

myininaya (myininaya):

right

myininaya (myininaya):

i can write it more neatly if you like

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats fine, just that last step i did on paper

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so why does my book insist on reducing only the irreducible

OpenStudy (anonymous):

irreducible actually depends on the field i think, since 1 / (x^2 +1) is reducible in C

myininaya (myininaya):

well i only know this true so far for the form 1/[x*(x^2-a)] which is reduceable

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmmmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you dont think 1 / [(x-a)^n (x^2+bx+c)^n] = A1/(x-a) + A2/ ( x-a)^2 + ... An/(x-a)^n + (B1x+C1)/ (x^2+bx+c) + (B2x + C2) / (x^2+bx+c)^2 + ... + (Bn x + Cn ) / (x^2+bx+c)^n

myininaya (myininaya):

maybe it is easier just to memorize just reduce just in case instead of remembering for certain forms it is akay not to reduce

myininaya (myininaya):

thats ugly to me cantorset lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no it has a nice pattern

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The property of irreducibility depends on the field F; a polynomial may be irreducible over some fields but reducible over others

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right, the field F, but we can just change the field to suit our problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes...we are dealing with real analysis here

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so F is the field of R

OpenStudy (anonymous):

like integral 1 / ( x^2 + 1) = int 1 / (x+ i ) + 1/ (x-i) i believe

myininaya (myininaya):

tan inverse of x

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1/ x^2 + 1 = A / x+i + B / x- i

myininaya (myininaya):

+C

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well thats complex analysis cantorset!

myininaya (myininaya):

what is e^(ix) in terms of sine and cosine again i cant remember something like sin(x)+icos(x)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, ok i see your point

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so you want to stay in field R, ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

by the way x+i and x-i are not polynomials in real analysis

myininaya (myininaya):

also if we assume int(1/(x^2+1))=int(1/(x+i))+int(1/(x-i))=then we get ln(x^2+1) but this gives us 2x/(x^2+1) when we take derivative which is not 1/(x^2+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i actually didnt do the A , and B thingy

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that was a guess

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1/ x^2 + 1 = A / x+i + B / x- i

myininaya (myininaya):

so A=-1/2i and B=1/2i lets see what happens

OpenStudy (anonymous):

brb

myininaya (myininaya):

i/2 *ln{(x-i)/(x+i)} i don't know if we can do anything with this

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

youre right about the arctangent though

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so my point was, can we relax our condition about being reducible , or irreducible?

myininaya (myininaya):

so far we can relax it for some reducibles like 1/[x*(x^2-a)] but not for forms that are irreducible

OpenStudy (anonymous):

is e^(arctanx)==((x-i)/(x+i))^(1/2i) true?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

irreducible over the reals, you mean

myininaya (myininaya):

i don't know saubihik i fail at complex analysis

myininaya (myininaya):

or whatever that is

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i can check my calculator

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but it might be off by a constant

myininaya (myininaya):

how do you plug imaginarys into your calculator?

myininaya (myininaya):

can we just pretend since they are imaginary lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i have TI 84

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think its true and may be by some constant and so yah u can do partial fracs with rational functions having COMPLEX VARIABLES

OpenStudy (anonymous):

only the answer will come in complex terms but dont woory thats same!!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!