\[2a_{n-1}-a _{n-2}=3n\] in recurreance relation .. how?????
ok; what is the question?
that equ is equal to 3n .. how it is equal to 3n?? that is my question
well, lets see if we can algebrate it :)
-A{n-2} = -2A{n-1} +3n ; *-1 A{n-2} = 2A{n-1} - 3n for starters ... right?
but perhaps the n-1 should ne out front...
see this if u could get anything for this question = 2(3(n – 1)) – 3(n – 2) = 3n = an.
2A{n-1} = A{n-2} + 3n /2 A{n-1} = (1/2) A{n-2} + 3n/2
if we add 1 to all the nth terms we get: A{n} = (1/2) A{n-1} +3(n+1)/2
and you say the goal is to get to the recursive equation right?
i dont understand this part: "see this if u could get anything for this question = 2(3(n – 1)) – 3(n – 2) = 3n = an."
ya actually the left side equation was translated to right side 3n in an recurreance solving ................
i too actually dont understand anything from that... the question means the equ on left on side since i need to type in equation editor i typed just as question .
is there a bigger qquestion that this problem comes form? it feels like I am trying to get into it halfway thru.
no no. not like that
it is starting only
wait i will try to google and find anything i can ..
well, from what you gave me; this is the most sense I can derive from it :)
A{n} = (1/2) A{n-1} +3(n+1)/2
wait i will send u the link of that ppt
ok :)
this is that ppt see in it
in slide 4
i see it; let me read it and see what I can glean :)
kkkk. waiting for ur reply....
the first step should be to render a table of values to compare to; right? use the recurence equation to establish the data .... is my first thought
k..
if no initial conditions are specified; then a recurrence relation can have multiple solutions; becasue there is no parameters to anchor them to a specific point
table of values in the sense it must be its initial values??
if we had initial values; then we could construct a table to match the data to; yes
suppose I give you an equation like this: y = 2x + d would you be able to graph it?
ya
how? since the y intercept is a variable, where are you gonna put it on the graph?
since it is a recurreance relation they solve it by backward substitution method
the point they are making in slide 4 is that without initial values; there are many solutions that may exist.
A{n} = 3n is a possiblility; so is A{n} = 5
the relation simply states that there is a potential family relations that exhibit the same structure; but differ only by parameters
just as the line y = 2x + d can have many solutions; it all depends on the value of the y intercept 'd'.
actually there may be many values. but how that left side = right side eqn . get to this link and see page 2 in that pdf how they have solved that recurreance using backward substitution . http://www.cse.unl.edu/~choueiry/S11-235/files/recitation16.pdf i think we need to do like that to solve left side eqn to bring to right side eqn
i need to know how they figured out right side eqn from left side eqn??
by that method can u solve the above eqn on left side and bring it on right side
well, they didnt really solve it in slide 4; they just determined that #n was a possible solution right? and let me go over it again to make sure im on the same page as them...
have u seen the pdf ??
well, yeah, but only if you establish an initial condition; otherwise any A{0} will work
i saw the pdf, ive even gone thru some of these things before :)
working backwards you can establish a recurrence equation to determine any nth value and so on
oh that right. how to establish in the above question and bring 3n??
A{n} = 2A{n-1} – A{n-2} ; n = 2, 3, 4, … Is A{n} = 3n a solution? 2A{n-1} – A{n-2} ; insert '3(n)' and solve 2 ( 3(n – 1)) – 3(n – 2) ; for n=2, 3(2) 2(3(1)) - 3(0) = 3(2) 2(3) - 0 = 3(2) 2(3) = 3(2) right?
when n = 3 does it work? 2 ( 3(n – 1)) – 3(n – 2) ; for n=3, 3(3) 2(3(2)) - 3(1) = 3(3) 2(6) - 3 = 3(3) 12 - 3 = 3(3) right?
Is 3n a solution to the relation? It can be, and it is valid
ya thanks.............
We can replace A{n} by 3n and have a valid solution
slide 3 states what I said ;)
since we know 3n is the answer we could substitute and prove?? if we have not known how would we have finded the 3n?? that is my question
'3n' only works because we have no 'initial conditions' in place.
slide 5 proves that A{n} = 5 is just as valid a solution
if we have no initial cnd then we have multiple solution?? right that is what written in slide
that is correct; without knowing where to start from; its impossible to get back there again
right. are u having any material for studying recurreance relation from basic????
just whats in the college library over here; oh..and I found a real good teacher online... videos actually. arsdigita, google video arsdigita
to make a point, all these curves have the same equation except for a y intercept to anchor them. without knowing that initial condition, which graph is the right one?
ya . correct got your point..... thanks. i will see arsdigita videos.. some other materials ??
it chopped it .... paste that whole thing in your address bar for the videos
ya thanks... recurrence comes in discrete mathematics????
recurrence is alot of discrete math yes :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!