solve m=2x+3y for y?
y=m-2x/3
Alright, I'll need your input to solve this, italian. You ready for this?
y=(m-2x)/3
Just giving them the answer won't help them learn lol You've gotta let them work through the answer. :P
lol uber. sorry. shall delete my answer.
Just giving them the answer won't help them learn lol You've gotta let them work through the answer. :P absolutely agree with this.
Italian? Still here? We need to work through this if you wanna learn the steps. :P
yeah im here
Awesome! So which letter do we want by itself?
y
perfect! m=2x+3y
First thing we want is for y to be positive. Is it?
awesome! So this means we won't be subtracting y and that we'll be leaving it on the right side of the equals sign so that it stays positive. Now, we want y by itself. What is currently bothering it?
Here's the equation again: m=2x+3y
Yup! Now, here's the thing: for now we'll make believe that the 3 and y are buddies and don't want to separate.
However... someone else is being really annoying. Who is that?
Indeed. How do we make the 2x go away?
Well, if we do that, we'd have to divide *everything* by 2x. That'd give us: m/2x = 3y/2x
do we really want this?
Note that 2y just got even closer to that 2x that was annoying him. :(
no should you subtract?
Perfect! So how will our equation look?
m-2x=3y?
Perfect!
Now y can finally be by himself after one more step.
then you divide both sides by 3 right?
Heck ya! :D
And what's our final answer? This step can be tricky.
haha thanks a lot
No problemo. Go ahead and add the finishing steps just to make sure we've got this. ^_^
very close. Remember you have to divide everything by 3.
There was one variable that you forgot to divide by 3.
perfect!
Alternatively, if you felt like it, m/3 - 2x/3 = y can also work :D
Feel free to post another problem like this as a question to be on the safe side! More practice = more 100s! :P
Of course. Feel free to make up a new separate question. :D
You mean a different letter? It's already solved for t :P
Ah ok.
Well, let's start by trying to make r be less cramped. It's dangerous to work with things inside of parenthesis, so we should try to keep that for later.
So... what CAN we do for now?
Here's a hint with something similar: 5 = (3+7)/2
Well, here's the thing: The example I showed is using totally different numbers, but is in the same general 'form' as your question, right?
numbers in parentheses divided by a single number = another number, yes?
In my example, the 7 is the equivalent to the P that we want to separate in your example. Does that part make sense?
If it doesn't make sense, do let me know, and I'll explain it.
here is the equation a different way \[t=p/6+3r/6\]
To be honest, the original form of (p+3r) is to your advantage. However, it can also work here if you know the trick.
Okie dokie.
So going back to my 'similar example', we want to separate the 7, right? 5 = (3+7)/2 What can we do to my example to make the right side less messy?
multiply by 2?
perfect :D
and what does that give us so far in my example?
hold on
10=(3+7)
Yup! Now that (3+7) is by itself, what can we get rid of?
get rid of the ()
Yup! and then how do you get the 7 by itself when you have 10 = 3+7?
subtract the 3 from both sides
Awesome. I lost your original problem. lol Could you repost it?
The one with the P?
t=(p+3r)/6 for r
awesome. So what's the easiest way to make it look less ugly?
multiply both sides by 6
Indeed. What do we get?
6t=p+3r
yup! Now who is annoying our buddy r? (I think we were solving for r, right?)
Hint: always remove items that can be moved easily to the other side first.
yes and the friend p
Yup. Make that p buzz off. We hate that guy.
6t-p=3r? then divide both sides by 3 to get the answer?
Yessssshhhhhh
BUT, here's a tip: always check your answers.
t=(p+3r)/6 for r
let's plug in numbers to make this work. Let's make the parentheses equal 12 so that t can equal 2. That way we'll have 12/6 =2
what we can do is... make r equal 2 and p equal 6. Make sense?
yes
awesome. Could you go ahead and test it out for me, then? (Your answer, that is)
here's what you came up with: 6t-p=3r turns into r = 2t - p/3
so is 2 = 2(2)-6/3 ? Or 2 = 4-2?
All is well? ^_^
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!