Does this proof make sense. prove n! > n^2 for n>=4. So we assume that k^2 < k! Notice that that k>1 is equivalent to 2k+1 < 3k It follows that k>= 4 we have 2k+1 < 3k < (k)! k Now using the assumption k^2 < k! we have k^2 +(2k+1) < k! +(2k+1) + k! +(k)! k=(k+1)! So (k+1)^2 < (k+1)!
i see eyes, lol
this is a proof by induction, yes? seems ok. a proof by induction always needs verification of the base case, though. so check 4! = 4*3*2 = 24, which is larger than 4^2.
but what about the step, (k+1)!
this is false k^2 +(2k+1) < k! +(2k+1) + k! +(k)! k=(k+1)!
ah yes, you're right. that is incorrect.
hehe
hi pooch
Cantor, does this qualify as a valid proof of induction? Assume: k >= 4 From k >= 4, k > 1 From k >= 4 we also get the result k*k >= 4*k thus k^2 >= 4k So, if we assume that k! > k^2, then: (k + 1)! = (k + 1) * k! > (k + 1) * k^2 > (k + 1) * 4k (since k^2 >= 4k) (k + 1) * 4k = 4k^2 + 4k = 4k^2 + 3k + k > 4k^2 + 3k + 1 (since k > 1) 4k^2 + 3k + 1 > k^2 + 2k + 1 (for all k) And k^2 + 2k + 1 = (k + 1)^2 And thus (k + 1)! > (k + 1)^2
one sec
yes that works, a bit odd , but fine :)
you proved a different question 2^n < n! , i was asking n^2 < n!, but i think your proof works for the former
wait this is false
sorrry:)
2^(k+1) =2.2^k <2.k! <(k+1k! =(k+1)!
you wrote 2.2^k < 2.k!, thats false
B.S : 2^k<k!
thats your inductive step, clean your proof up
HAMED!!!! your proof needs a bit of work and finesse. the logic is dodgy
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!