Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does this proof make sense. prove n! > n^2 for n>=4. So we assume that k^2 < k! Notice that that k>1 is equivalent to 2k+1 < 3k It follows that k>= 4 we have 2k+1 < 3k < (k)! k Now using the assumption k^2 < k! we have k^2 +(2k+1) < k! +(2k+1) + k! +(k)! k=(k+1)! So (k+1)^2 < (k+1)!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i see eyes, lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is a proof by induction, yes? seems ok. a proof by induction always needs verification of the base case, though. so check 4! = 4*3*2 = 24, which is larger than 4^2.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about the step, (k+1)!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is false k^2 +(2k+1) < k! +(2k+1) + k! +(k)! k=(k+1)!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah yes, you're right. that is incorrect.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hehe

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hi pooch

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Cantor, does this qualify as a valid proof of induction? Assume: k >= 4 From k >= 4, k > 1 From k >= 4 we also get the result k*k >= 4*k thus k^2 >= 4k So, if we assume that k! > k^2, then: (k + 1)! = (k + 1) * k! > (k + 1) * k^2 > (k + 1) * 4k (since k^2 >= 4k) (k + 1) * 4k = 4k^2 + 4k = 4k^2 + 3k + k > 4k^2 + 3k + 1 (since k > 1) 4k^2 + 3k + 1 > k^2 + 2k + 1 (for all k) And k^2 + 2k + 1 = (k + 1)^2 And thus (k + 1)! > (k + 1)^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

one sec

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes that works, a bit odd , but fine :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you proved a different question 2^n < n! , i was asking n^2 < n!, but i think your proof works for the former

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait this is false

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorrry:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2^(k+1) =2.2^k <2.k! <(k+1k! =(k+1)!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you wrote 2.2^k < 2.k!, thats false

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B.S : 2^k<k!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats your inductive step, clean your proof up

OpenStudy (anonymous):

HAMED!!!! your proof needs a bit of work and finesse. the logic is dodgy

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe! Sometimes my focus is not enough to solve problem. And I'm not steel an exprienced person. Sorry again and thanks for your guidance.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!