Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

In the triangle KLM, KL = 14 and LM = 32. Which is a true conclusion? Answer KM − KL > 2(32) KL − KM > 32 LM + KL < 32 KM − LM < 14

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can sumbody help me please

OpenStudy (anonymous):

none. I think.

OpenStudy (mathteacher1729):

The Triangle Inequality is useful for this problem. Basically it says that the lengths of the two shortest sides of the triangle must be greater than the longest side of the triangle.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it has 2 b one of those

OpenStudy (sriram):

d is probably correct

OpenStudy (mathteacher1729):

Hint: (to help eliminate at least one of the choices) Suppose KL and LM are the SHORTEST sides of the triangle. Then, by the triangle inequality, when you add KL and LM it should be LONGER than the third side.

OpenStudy (sriram):

bcoz difference of 2 sides of triangle is greater than the 3rd side

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You mean the SUM of 2 sides is greater that the 3rd side

OpenStudy (sriram):

x+y > z implies z-x<y

OpenStudy (sriram):

here x,y,z are sides of tiangle

OpenStudy (mathteacher1729):

Also, in your example Sriram, z is the LARGEST side. so x + y > z or z - y < x or z - x < y Again, if z is the LARGEST side.

OpenStudy (sriram):

nope it is true for all sides try it wid any of the sides u will get the same result

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Bottom line: the answer is not in the given

OpenStudy (mathteacher1729):

Oh my god. :( I am sleepy. Of course it works this way. If z is the smallest side, it is , BY DEFAULT smaller than either of the other two, and of course smaller than their sum. Oh dear.

OpenStudy (sriram):

the answer is d!! given above

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What do you mean by d?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Assume he means KM − LM < 14...

OpenStudy (mathteacher1729):

Ok, I must redeem myself, so here we go. :) I originally mis-stated the triangle inequality. I stated a specific version, but the FULL version says "The sum of ANY TWO lengths of a triangle MUST BE greater than the third length." Now, for this problem... In the triangle KLM, KL = 14 LM = 32 KM = unknown The question is: which is a true conclusion? KM − KL > 2(32) This makes no sense. It's saying that KM > KL + 2(32). The third side of the triangle cannot be greater than the sum of the other two lengths. KL − KM > 32 Again, this makes no sense. It's saying KL > 32 + KM. The third side of the triangle cannot be greater than the sum of the other two lengths. LM + KL < 32 Once more, we have something which contradicts the triangle inequality. The sum of two sides must be greater than the other side or you don't have a triangle. KM − LM < 14 This DOES make sense. It says KM < LM + 14 Which is to say, The sum of LM and 14 (or LM and KL) is GREATER Than the other side. This is the triangle inequality and this is correct. :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!