how to solve this integral question? integral of [(x power 7m+x power 2m+x power m)].[(2x power 6m+7x power m+14)] power 1/m
Is this right? \[\int\limits_{}^{}(x^{7m} + x^{2m} + x^m)*(2x^{6m} + 7x^m + 14)^{1/m}\]
ya
Is the whole equation to the power 1/m, or just the second term?
only the second term...
This isn't going to be easy by hand, if at all possible.
i suppose we are integrating with respect to x right?
ya i knw dat...i did dat but amnt getting it..
Yeah, I don't think there is an easy way to solve this by hand. Where did the problem come from?
this problem is above me lol
wait did you try integration by parts?
maybe we can find a pattern and right it as a sum
write*
Integration by parts is useless; Since we don't know what m is, there's no way to reduce the degree of the polynomial.
we can see if there is a pattern though and write it as a sum
yea i dont think it will work though
its from tata mc grawls...its realy tough
all the problem lies in m ... we jus assume that m is one ... that way i can tell what the answer is but with m its too complicated
@myininaya "we can see if there is a pattern though and write it as a sum" Some fiddling about with Wolfram does appear to give a pattern for the integral: mx^(m-1)[Ax^2m + Bx^6m + Cx^7m + D x^12m + Ex^m + F) all over m(2x^6m + 7x^m + 14) ^ (m-1/m) where A to F are given by A = 35 + 14(m-2) B = 212 +100(m-2) C = 125 +53(m-2) D = 40 14(m-2) E = 77 +35(m-2) F = 28+14(m-2) So you could substitute these in to get the thing but I am feeling too lazy to do that. My guess is Wolfram is using some kind of series calculations so I don't really know how accurate A to F are, maybe more time with the computation would produce something a bit different.
yeah i was pretty lazy too about this problem mostly because it looks too ugly
guys please explain me this question please??
I thought we did?
I just put an answer above...
estudier please explain me step by step please...?
i recall some place to use a "z sub" where z is an exponential term that plays nicely with others ..
wats dat?
cant recall the details a tthe moment. but they take a common factor of the exponents and use a term that can make the work easier by substitution. whether it works here or not i dunno
wat is z sub?
its the same as "h sub" but with a z :) like i said, i cant recall the details that well
oh ok
I used Wolfram to integrate the expression starting with 1/2 then 1/3, 1/4 etc. From this you can see a pattern in the results from which you can obtain a general result inn m.
Perhaps there is a tricky way to do it analytically but I don't know it.
(x^7m^2 +x^2m^2 +1^m) (2x^6m +7x^m +14)^1/m x^14m +x^42m +1^m 2x^6m +7x^m +14 -------------------- 2x^(20m) +2x^(50m) +2x^(7m) 7x^(15m) +7x^(43m) +7x^(2m) +14x^(14m) +14x^(42m) +14x^(m) -------------------------------------------- | 2x^(20m) +2x^(50m) +2x^(7m) | ^1/m | 7x^(15m) +7x^(43m) +7x^(2m) | | +14x^(14m) +14x^(42m) +14x^(m) | ---------------------------------------------- I got know idea what im doing at the moment :)
u know what happened to Hamilton and the Quaternions, Cantor and his infinities....
me? aint got clue
Joke...you will go a bit mad..:-)
That's not USA mad that's Brit mad.
:)
whta u can do is ...take x common in the first part of the question....then take that x into the part which has power .... then substitute the part under power ... u will see the other part gets canceled .....then a simple integration would work
You lost me....
u lost me???
You might be right, I'd like to see it.
i believe he said factor out an x^m and up it to the mth power and insert it into the mthroot
i kinda did that by a mth-ed up the whole thing
no put x into 1/m ..then it becomes x^m
thats what I said :)
sry i understood it wrong
OK, so what's the integral then?
\[\int\limits_{}^{}(x^{7m-1} + x^{2m-1} + x^{m-1})*(2x^{7m} + 7x^{2m} + 14x^{m})^{1/m}\]
1/14m{ [(2x^7m + 7x^2m +14x^m)^1/m +1 ] / 1/m + 1}
\[u=2x^{7m}+7x^{2m}+14x^{m}\] \[1/14\int\limits_{?}^{?}u^{1/m}du\]
thats what i was trying to say... thank thomas
You deserve all the credit Ishaan :)
If you let x = 1/m, what cancels out?
The way I did it by hand was to first exponentiate everything in the second parentheses by 1/m. Then I expanded everything out. Then break up the integral and do separate u subs.
you cant let x =i/m ...x is a variable ........while m is const
its not i its 1
Oh, i read up a few lines you said to do that?
no i said to take x common out of the first expression........and then put it under power 1/m
OH.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!