How do I verify an inner product?
What do you mean?
You need to check if it satisfies the inner product axioms: 1) conjugate symmetry 2) linearity in the first argument 3) positive-definiteness
here:
V is a vector space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to 3.
You need to show that it satisfies each of those axioms.
I never heard of any of those..
The inner product is defined by those axioms.
1)\[\langle x, y \rangle =\overline{\langle y, x \rangle}\] 2)\[\langle x + c, y \rangle = \langle x , y \rangle + \langle c, y \rangle\]\[\langle ax, y \rangle = a\langle x , y \rangle \] 3)\[\langle x, x \rangle \geq 0\] and 0 only when x=0
what does <y,x> with a line on top mean?
conjugate. if your course doesn't deal with the complex field just ignore it
oh we don't deal with complex numbers.
anyways show that the inner product satisfies the axioms to "verify" it
okay thanks ill just go over some problems and attempt this.
Tell me what the problem is.
okay hold on..
Here.. part C
Yes so have you tried showing that it satisfies each of the axioms?
<x+c,y> .. but what are my xs and cs and ys?
Its about showing linearity. Have you ever been asked to prove a transformation is linear?
yes.
Its the same concept.
okay let me try..
\[\langle f(x), g(x) \rangle = \int_{\pi}^{\pi}f(x)g(x) = \int_{\pi}^{\pi}g(x)f(x) = \langle g(x)f(x) \rangle\] \[\langle f(x) + h(x), g(x) \rangle\]\[= \int_{\pi}^{\pi}(f(x) + h(x))g(x) = \int_{\pi}^{\pi}f(x)g(x) + \int_{\pi}^{\pi}h(x)g(x) = \langle g(x)f(x) \rangle + \langle h(x)f(x) \rangle\]
alchemista i was doing it this way.. hold on ima show u.. dunno if that's the same thing..
err sorry small mistake
\[ = \langle f(x), g(x) \rangle + \langle h(x), g(x) \rangle\]
here is this the same thing?
yeah
okay thanks and then I do basically alpha(f(x)) = f(alphax)
also prove conjugate symmetry and positive definiteness. basically show that the integral of f(x)^2 is positive and 0 only when you have the 0 function which is easy.
that's for the positive definiteness part
Hey Alchemista i'll post the continuation as a new thread i was working on the 2nd part of the proof..
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!