Is there a way to find the domain and range of y=tan(2x-pi) without a calculator? If yes, how?
memory ...
the range of tan is not effected by an shifts in period or other..
the domain is tho .... recall that the normal domain is between -pi\2 and pi/2
-pi/2 < theta < pi/2 solve it to get x
so the domain would be (-pi/2, pi/2), and range be (-infinity, +infinity)?
here theta is 2x - pi
(2x-pi) ; factor out the 2 2(x- pi/2) ; the domain for tan is then pi/2 ; shifted by pi/2 to the right I believe ...
I'm sorry, I don't really understand. Why would I need to factor out the 2? If it is -pi/2 < 2x - pi < pi/2, then wouldn't I add pi to all, then divide everything by 2 to get: pi/4 < x< 3pi/4?
it has to do with how a trig function is transformed
you got it denebel the answer !! : )
tan(x) is the normal looking trig function; we modify the period with a "w" such that tan(wx) has a period of pi/w right?
a phase shift is where we move the graph left or right; tan(x-p) would shift it
tan(wx-p) accounts for both of these transformations such that we first factor out the "w" to see our phace shift ... if i recall it correctly
wolfram gives us this to look at .. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan%282x-pi%29
amistre64: pi/2 is the period right..? Ishaan94: The domain will be (pi/4, 3pi/4)? And the range can be (-infinity, +infinity)?
yeah i think so denebel
Thanks :) wait, amistre64: for the link http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan%282x-pi%29, what does the result (tan(2x)) mean?
i was wondering that meself, i beleive it means that modifying it by pi has no real effect to it since the period is pi to begin with
pi/2 is the period yes
this wolfram shows that tan(2x-pi) is the same as tan(2(x- pi/2)). I tend to not be so confident when working from me memory ;) http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3Dtan%282x-pi%29+and+y%3Dtan%282%28x-%28pi%2F2%29%29%29
o___o I am a little confused now. According to Wolfram, the domain when this equation will be 'one to one' is (-pi/4, pi/4)... unless I am reading the graph wrong?? But I calculated it to be (pi/4, 3pi/4)....
if we take the normal span of tan(x) we go from -pi/2 to pi/2 as a "domain" -pi/2 < 2(x- pi/2) < pi/2 ; divide out the 2 -pi/4 < x- pi/2 < pi/4 ; + 2pi/4 to get. pi/4 < x < 3pi/4 ... which is really the same as: -pi/4 < x < pi/4
<....-pi/4..........pi/4..........3pi/4............5pi/4.........> etc ..
Uhm how is it that it is -pi/2<2(x-pi/2) < pi/2? I thought it would 2x-pi, instead of 2(x-pi/2)?
But by Wolfram, it is proved that the two equations are equal..
...how would I know about the second equation if only the first equation is given to me? By memory?
the issue with periodic functions is that they can be expressed in more than one way; which makes them a little tricky to deal with mentally
the proper way to define the domain would be to include/exclude; all the possibilities that arise from -inf to inf
the domain us all x such that x notEqual to some iteration of an add "pi/4".
... its like i had a stroke while typing lol
If I were to include all, wouldn't that not make it a 'one to one' function anymore? How could I express it? Would it be like (pi/4 + k*pi, 3pi/4 + k*pi)?
{x|x \(\ne n*\cfrac{pi}{4}\)} where n is an odd value .... there is a better way to express it but I cant think of it at the moment :) to make it a one-to-one function we would have to restrict the domain, and by convention that would be between -pi/4 and pi/4, but convention is just code for, "do as i say" lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!