Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

a double ordinate parabola (y^2)=2ax is of length 4a.... prove that the lines joining the vertex to its ends are at right angles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i dont understand the term length is 4a in this questio n..please explain me and also answer

myininaya (myininaya):

what is your understanding of a double ordinate?

myininaya (myininaya):

could you give me an example of where that is on a parabola?

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

a double ordinate is a line segment parallel to the latus rectum.

myininaya (myininaya):

i don't know these terms lol

myininaya (myininaya):

i mean i know what a line segment and parallel means

OpenStudy (anonymous):

aa ok....but what is that 4a ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah what are these terms? o.O google google.

myininaya (myininaya):

lol joe

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

also in this question y^2=2ax... General equation is y^2=4ax.. So the coordinates of focus will change and will not be a,0

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

a/2,0 is the focus of the parabola ..

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

so u can consider the end points of the double ordinate to be At^2,2At.. Where t is the parameter and A=a/2 the abcissca of the focus

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

then u can take 4At=4a that is the length of the double ordinate.. solve it to get t

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

then use pythagoras to prove its a right angled triangle at origin using distance formula to find the length

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

hope you can do it from here.. :)

myininaya (myininaya):

does anyone know where i can find a visual explanation of the double ordinate? i tried to google but failed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

me too, these seem to be really old terms >.<

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

oh.. wait i will try to create a visual representation..

myininaya (myininaya):

:)

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

http://ginryuukurochan.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/parabola/ in the pic of parabola DD' is the latus rectum n a line segment parallel to it is a double ordinate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i drew a picture of what i think is going on lol <.< and i used vectors and a dot product to show the two segments are perpendicular. One sec while i scan~

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If theres something wrong or if the picture is totally off let me know. As far as i could tell, the double ordinate is just a segment from the parabola to the axis of symmetry that is perpendicular to the axis.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

gotta love that misspelling of perpendicular in the drawing <.< im slightly intoxicated, its not my fault >.>

myininaya (myininaya):

lol you guys are so cool i guess we can call these geometry terms thanks for giving me a clearer understanding of them both of you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

latus rectum, sounds gross >.>

myininaya (myininaya):

i know i thought he was kidding on the name earlier

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

ya a good one joe...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sry if i sound immature >.< im normally more intelligent sounding! i promise!

myininaya (myininaya):

lol

myininaya (myininaya):

sure you are

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But was that picture correctly drawn? thats what im worrying about.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i am! i think >.>

myininaya (myininaya):

i think it looks good but i dont know what im talking about

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats enough for me lol, its good!

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

i think its right...

myininaya (myininaya):

where is the rectum of the parabola? lol

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

how come u guys dunno latus rectum??/ its official term.. which grades are u in?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Akshay Thank you :) @myininaya lol

myininaya (myininaya):

i have a masters in math lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im a lowly undergraduate.

myininaya (myininaya):

never heard of that term or the double ordinate or the ordinate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Me either, well, the last time ive officially played with parabolas is high school...in 01' 02'

myininaya (myininaya):

i guess depending on which school you go to you learn different things(i mean math is a huge subject its not like we can cover all of it)

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

oh... so i am privileged to help you guys..I jus did my 12th grade.:)

myininaya (myininaya):

wow what country?

myininaya (myininaya):

we are from usa we dont know crap

myininaya (myininaya):

lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im trying to make up for that! i read lol

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

i am from india.. moving to canada now... for engineering...

myininaya (myininaya):

i wish we learned more advanced things in high school i only got to alittle bit of algebra in high school never heard of a proof until college

myininaya (myininaya):

my high school sucked

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Mine too.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

They just taught up to past standardized tests. Nothing more.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

us* <.<

myininaya (myininaya):

all we did in my ap english class was crossword puzzles

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

SATs?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nope. They didnt even teach us at that level. Some states in the US have standardized testing. Its unique for each state. But the level of it is really really really really low.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

hehe.. u guys to have a sort of hatred towards ur high schools...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Its because they cheated us!

myininaya (myininaya):

yes us we could have been like you and knew what a freaking latus rectum was but no i barely knew what a quadratic equation was

myininaya (myininaya):

i know what it is now lol i'm talking about when i got done with high school

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I wish there had been a class on proofs. Just the basic ones. Like "prove square root of 2 is irrational", or "Give a proof of why you cant divide by 0", or "Prove that there is no such number that is both even or odd". I hate my school! argargarg.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

but now ur a undergraduate no/?? From where? which field?

myininaya (myininaya):

i was so envious of the chinese math grads they knew so much more than us americans and they caught on quicker than us its like they already knew the stuff and it was elementary to them

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

i believe even we Indians are also very fast thanks to concepts of vedic maths if you know?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i just googled it lol, interesting o.O

myininaya (myininaya):

i think there was one or two indian math grads they were smarter than us as well everyone is :(

myininaya (myininaya):

joe you should run for president and change our education system ok?

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

hehe.....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think i can do that without running for president lol >.<

myininaya (myininaya):

call yourself joemath i think it is catchy and everyone will be like omg joemath is smart because he has math in his name

OpenStudy (anonymous):

er...attempt to, thats what i meant.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hahaha

myininaya (myininaya):

people on the streets will vote for you because they know they cant add 2 to 3 and they know you will be able to do 2+3

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

hehe... U guys seem to b quite determined to change the system... hope to see reforms in d cumin years.. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Where were you guys a few days ago >.> there were some people ganging up on me about the answer to a question. It was, "How many solutions are there to the equation: \[\sqrt{x} = -4\]"

myininaya (myininaya):

lol i dont know if it is possible to change the system

myininaya (myininaya):

0 solutions

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

0 real solutions..

myininaya (myininaya):

yes 0 real solutions

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right!! they were telling me x = 16 was a solution, and I tried my hardest to convince them, but they were acting like i was some crazy guy trying to spread lies and misinformation >.>

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

hehe.. missed the fun!!

myininaya (myininaya):

lol poor joe all by himself

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

they must be taking it as root of 16 is +-4.. right?

myininaya (myininaya):

did you show them the curve y=sqrt{x} and the line y=-4 have no intersection?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it was frustrating <.< i gave so many good reasons why there were no real solutions <.< I talked about when you square equations you create extraneous solutions. I talked about the graph of f(x) = sqrt(x) and g(x) = -4 not intersecting. @Akshay yeah, thats probably what they were thinking.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

ya xactly thats what i was gonna say

OpenStudy (anonymous):

LOL yeah myininaya great minds think alike :P

myininaya (myininaya):

so that didn't convinced them how interesting

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

hehe.. i thot d same like you guys!

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

what happened finally?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The person that created the question ended up deleting it lol >.< i think he was trying to get help with another question, but there were probably 12-15 people in his old thread arguing about that problem haha.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

ya how do we integrate root of sinx?

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

i asked it some1 gave me an elliptical answer... isn't there a normal method?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

u'r a genius :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not every integral has a "nice", "normal" answer. It might be something like that.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticIntegraloftheSecondKind.html look at this.. I tried but couldnt understand most of it :(

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!