So I just heard my advisor lecture his students that performing a double integral on an expression is not the same thing as integrating that expression twice (all with respect to a single, independent variable). The context of the problem was the solution of an autonomous, 2nd order ODE: \[\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=f(x).\]Apparently, \[\int \int \frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=\int \int f(x)\] is not the same thing as \[\int [ \int \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} ]=\int [ \int f(x) ]\]Why did he say that?
i don't know i always work inside to outside i don't see how it isn't the same (yuck double negative) i see it as the same
He further added, although rather ambiguously, that a second integral had more to do with spatial concepts. I didn't want to question him for fear that my students would lose trust in my reviews during TA sessions, had I been wrong in some remote, arcane sense. Perhaps they're not the same thing when viewed from a more convoluted position?
so he didn't have any limits?
i remember you can't switch the outside integral with the inside integral sometimes
There were no limits; the problem was stated just as I wrote it.
imran any thoughts?
no , my brain is melting from physics
physics>math ?
If you know quantum physics, talk to me. xd
no, just classical
ok i'm going to see if i can find anything on your double integral question
I think we can switch order if limits are constant, or something
I totally agree with you that they're not the same thing when limits are incorporated. Perhaps he just said that to discourage students from thinking about it that way?
f(x)=5x \[\int\limits_{}^{}\int\limits_{}^{}(5x) dx dx=\int\limits_{}^{}(\frac{5x^2}{2}+C)dx=\frac{5x^3}{2(3)}+Cx+D=\frac{5x^3}{6}+Cx+D\] is this incorrect?
It's correct.
but i did this \[\int\limits_{}^{} [\int\limits_{}^{}5x dx] dx\]
i performed the inside integral first then the outside
You know what, I think he may have just messed up because, as far as I know, that's how you solve a double integral.
what was he integrating with respect to...did he leave that off like you wrote?
He stated we were talking about one dependent and one independent variable. So the integral (in this case) was (implicitly) with respect to x.
I'll ask him about this and see what reason he gives me.
I only see a difference when there are limits dxdy vs dA
\[\int\limits_{}^{}\int\limits_{}^{}(5x)dxdy=\int\limits_{}^{}(\frac{5x^2}{2}+C)dy=\frac{5x^2y}{2}+Cy+D\] \[\neq\] \[\int\limits_{}^{}\int\limits_{}^{}(5x)dydx=\int\limits_{}^{}(5xy+C) dx=\frac{5x^2y}{2}+Cx+D\] maybe he left the limits off because he was trying to be general
not the limits
but what we are integrating with respect too
ok i have to figure out how to program a line in c++
eventhough imran wants me to use cg
we need to be a little careful when we do things like... \["\int\limits_{}^{}\int\limits_{}^{}(5x)dxdy=\int\limits_{}^{}(\frac{5x^2}{2}+C)dy=\frac{5x^2y}{2}+Cy+D"\] if we have a two variable function then \[\int\int 5x \,\,dxdy=\int\left(\frac{5}{2}x^2+g(y)\right)dy\] since \[\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{5}{2}x^2+g(y)\right)=5x^2\]
you are right
gj zarkon! i would give you another medal if i could
As far as I know, he was wrong. (I don't see any reason the brackets modify the scenario.) I also know that this input is not exactly relevant 10 months later.
nobody noticed my typo ;) \[\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{5}{2}x^2+g(y)\right)=5x\]
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!