Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

How do I estimate the number of tennis balls that would fit in a classroom? I have to make assumptions and plan (sketch, equations to be used, etc). PLEASE HELP!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

find the volume of the room find the volume of a tennis ball

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what if I don't know the volume of the room or the volume of a tennis ball?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

create variables?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm supposed to estimate and make assumptions...

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Assume a tennis ball's diameter is 2.5 inches (it's really 2.62 but whatever which means it will take up 2.5 square inches. Assume a room size of 20ft x 20ft which is 240 inches by 240 inches. 240^2 gives you the size of the room in square inches...just divided that by 2.5^2 to get 9216 tennis balls.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

assuming your room is a box and now a circle, V=WLH volume of a tennisball you could find out

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

The volume of a tennis ball is really irrelevant since it will take up a square (2.62 in^2) when placed in a room

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but to be precise

OpenStudy (anonymous):

btw are you using area as that is only 2 dimensional... assuming the room's ceiling is on the floor

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do you mean by 2-dimensional?

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Well...that's assuming you're going to fill up empty space in between each ball which you can't do unless you compress them...which would be whole other problem involved compressibility!

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Crap..it should have been 240^3..you got me on that :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

exactly! but if she wants to fill a room full of tennisballs you'd want to use volume. if she wanted to fill the floor with tennisballs it'd be area.... i'm sure this is not a compressibility problem

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

and 2.5^3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do half tennisballs count?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and volume of a tennisball would be right also ... so volume = 4/3 PI * R^3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no half tennisballs don't count but I'm supposed to fill the whole room, therefore I should use volume? How do I create the equations/formulas?

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Ok...I corrected the square vs cubic inch mistake :) Assume a tennis ball's diameter is 2.5 inches (it's really 2.62 but whatever). Therefore it will take up 2.5 CUBIC inches (corrected). Assume a room size of 20ft x 20ft which is 240 inches by 240 inches by 240 inches. 240^3 gives you the volume of the room in cubic inches...just divided that by 2.5^3 to get 884736 tennis balls. \[240^3/2.5^3=884736\]

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

I still say the spherical volume doesn't matter...it's going to fill up a square in the room unless you compress them

OpenStudy (anonymous):

they aren't stacking on top of eachother?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

think of tennisballs much like a liquid in chemistry. they aren't just going to stack on top of eachother. they will fill spaces in between

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the approximation of your answer will be close to mine though probably

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Uncompressed, they will take up 2.5in^3...whether they are stacked or not...I don't see where the confusion is.

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

In real life, there would be some compression but that would of course be a deeper problem than what he's being asked IMO

OpenStudy (anonymous):

where is your 2.5 cubic inches coming from... and sorry millie about this

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

The diameter (effective length) of a tennis ball cubed.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and what is that suppose to stand for.... area, volume, i'm not quite understanding why you are cubing it what equation are you using

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhh, i see.. I'm only asked to estimate so yeah.

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

volume of a cube :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

true but is a ball a cube... my approximation will be within a higher degree of accuracy

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Well, I politely disagree :) I guess he should add another assumption that the balls won't compress as they get stacked...which would be more likely if he just shrunk the classroom to 10x10x10 :P

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

My estimates are essentially based on the bounding (square) volume of the ball...not the spherical volume...since there will be space between the balls...that's all I'm saying

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

He can feel free to use spherical volume if he wishes...but I still think my result would be closer

OpenStudy (anonymous):

o.o

OpenStudy (anonymous):

either way millie you can do it his way or mine V=LWH for your room Volume of your sphere will equal 4/3*PI R^3 soo your equation will look something like this if done my way \[\frac{Volume of Room}{\frac{4\pi}{3(2.63^3)}}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or \[\frac {Volume of room}{\frac{4}{3}\pi*(2.63)^3}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this will give you an approximation of how many tennisballs in any box/rectangular room

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we could also add compression if you so desire storm lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

o yeah!! and round the number down as you can't have half a tennisball

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

I stand by my balls

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Ok, I can't let this go...it's just not in my nature :) Let's say you have a box that's 1000 cubic inches (10x10x10) and marbles which are all 1 cubic inch. Clearly, you can only fit 1000 marbles in the box. However, by your formula, you'd be able to fit ~1910 marbles. The difference is large and is obviously due to the wasted space between the marbles. So when I was talking about tennis balls, I assume they are not being compressed and will fit the same formula. If they were compressed the problem becomes significantly more complicated as they will compress differently depending on how many balls are above each one. One last note, if you use your formula, you have to remember that 2.63 is the diameter of the ball so you'd only half of that in your formula.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and actually it wouldn't be that it would be \[\frac{volume of room}{\frac{4}{3}\pi(1.315)^3}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

umm clearly if you get 1 cubic inch for the marble that is the volum eof the sphere and not a cube of the sphere

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I noticed it after i came back... we kept using 2.63 so

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

A cubic inch is a cubic inch....the ball doesn't have to fill the cube but each side of the cube would be 1 inch in length.

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

I just don't think I'm explaining this well enough...it's clear as day to me

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Maybe from a different angle: the room volume is 100% of the volume in the room. The ball's spherical volume doesn't account for the wasted space around the ball which takes away from how many balls you can fit into the room when you divide the room volume by the spherical volume. My cubic inch marbles take up exactly 1 cubic inch because I'm using an imaginary bounding box around each of ball of 1 inch in diameter. If however we were use the volume of the sphere formula on a 1inch marble, you'd get ~.5 cubic inches making it appear to take up less space than it actually does. All of which makes perfect since which you consider that your formula would have fit ~1910 marbles in the same space I say would only be able to hold 1000 marbles.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

your method is like taking blocks and building up. Basically like a toddler trying to make a square am i right? However that Volume of the cube could be a hugeeeeee depending on the significance for the room. so say you take a diameter of 2 like earlier a volume of a cube with side 2 will equal 8 as a volume of a ball will equal 4.1887.... significant difference if you are trying to fit a ton of balls into one spot.. take 4 for diameter your square will pull off a womping volume of 64 while the sphere is a simple 33.5

OpenStudy (anonymous):

your answer will be close but not as accurate as perhaps finding the actual volume of the room to the actual volume of the ball and then dividing it and rounding down to get rid of all half balls

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Yes, it's like a toddler stacking squares...exactly. How does your method account for the wasted space around the balls? Each ball effectively takes up a square since other balls cannot encroach in each other's bounding cube

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it doesn't however yours just simply fills it with imaginary matter

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

it's not imaginary matter...it's space that cannot be filled by tennis balls

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but the spacing between each ball is not exactly the same

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

Why wouldn't the be the same? It may not be **exactly** but it should be close enough for this exercise. Again, my assumption here is that all of the tennis balls are exactly the same size and aren't being compressed when they are packed into the room. My point is simply that a 1inch box and a 1 inch in diameter ball will consume the same amount of *usable* space in this particular problem...

OpenStudy (stormfire1):

I guess in the end your method will be very accurate if you smush the balls into squares so they can be packed in tightly

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!