3 people are given a chance to win 20 dollars. They are lined up in a row so that one is in front of the other. The last person can see the front two, and the middle can see the only the front one, and the front person can see noone. C -> B -> A They are shown a box that has 5 cards in it, a king of spades, a queen of hearts, a 2 of spades, a 4 of diamonds, and an 8 of clubs. A card is taken from the box and pinned to the back of the shirt of each person. If they can determine logically, what color the card is on their own back, they will win the prize. Who wins the prize and .........
Who wins the prize and what color was their card?
I remember something similar to this......
me too, which is why i changed it so people couldnt cheat too much lol
So... what does each individual know?
each individual can see the card on the back of the person or persons in front of them
Let's say I am the dude in the back... then: I know what color the card on the middle dude is, and I know what color the card on the front dude is.
correct
I (dude C) know that there are only 5 cards, 3 of them black, and 2 of them red.
So, if the 2 front dudes both have black cards, I scream "I've got a red card! you guys both have black cards!" and we all claim $20 each.
oops, I mean the other way around: I see dudes A and B have red cards, so I scream" I've got a black card!, you two both have red cards!"
or... can they each communicate by yelling at each other?
there is only one prize to win, so they work it out in secret .. no talking to the others
oh...
So yeah, if I were dude C and I saw that both dudes A and B have red cards behind them, I think 'I must have a red one' and claim my $20
I mean 'I must have a black one'
that would be logical if the front 2 had reds, yes.
spose C doesnt say anything, what does that lead B to think?
I thought none of them could hear each other walk away or speak
i guess i should include a time limit for clarity eh .... and at the last second one of them answers .... that sort of thing
but if I were dude B, and I can still sense dude C behind me, I might think 'if we both had red cards, then that lucky guy would have left already. Therefore either dude A or dude B (me) has a black card.' and then I see if dude A has a black or red card
so if C saw 2 reds, hed now right away that he had a black, but C says nothing .....
so the final answer would be that they all know?
only one figures it out in the end ...
:-( so perhaps only the middle guy would figure out
the possibilities are set up as this: C B A ------ b b b b r r ; not it since C would speak up first r b r r r b b b r b r b r b b C B A - ---- b b b r b r r r b b b r b r b r b b notice from whats left that B cant decide either; which means that there is only one possible solution for A
That's a nice way to approach it.
A has a black card
so if nobody speaks up, A has a black one?
yep
B A ---- b b b r b r b b r b r b these are the options for B sees A
I wish JamesJ came over here and gave us some really convincing inductive proof or something... :(
If A is red, B is black or red If A is black, B is black or red lets delete the uncertainties: br bb B A ---- r b r b A has to be black
At the last second, if guy C speaks up and says "I see a black card"... then what?
then its a different universe and they are playing a different game by different rules ....
:-D so the full proof is: Nobody speaks up. Therefore A has to be black.
since if people spoke up then they would know they had reds on their back?
correct; and i had a misthought in there; should go like this, If A is red, B is black If A is black, B is black or red
If they spoke up then they would know what color they had, since they dont speak up; that plays into the reasoning
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!