What is the fallacy inherent in Pascal's Wager?
there are like 10 fallacies, which do you want?
list all of them :-D
so I can pick them up and write about them.
my favorite is that it assumes there is only one religion to choose from, which clearly is false. it also assumes, for example, that if god exists and heaven exists, god rewards blind faith that has been given only for the selfish reason of trying to get into heaven.
Seems Pascal was only good for his calculator, triangle, and programming language. Was he a good philosopher too?
he's arguing that your only choices are to "believe", and he implicitly means believe in christianity, or "not believe", which leaves aside the possibility that they're both wrong and the only way into heaven is, I don't know, zoroastrianism or islam or some religion on another planet we've never heard of
I only thought of that first fallacy: "that it assumes there is only one religion to choose from, which clearly is false.". Gonna present that as the big argument
the wikipedia page of pascal's wager has a list of other fallacies
it must be really hard to be a teacher for any essay class today when students just rip stuff off the web all the time. at least when i was in school you had to go find a paper encyclopedia and copy manually, and most kids were too lazy to do that. it was easier to do the work.
Google is the world's librarian :-D
hmm but I think nearly all religion have the hell and heaven concept
ok, so which one should you believe? most of them have mutually incompatible requirements for getting into heaven. i will leave aside for a moment not one of them has good evidence for being true.
also, not all religions have heaven and hell. judaism, for example, speaks only vaguely about "the world to come". mormonism doesn't have a hell, but just three levels of heaven, the lowest of which is supposedly way better than earth.
therefore, Mormonism is the most pragmatic religion :-D
nah, i just invented a religion 5 minutes ago that says everyone gets into the billionth level of heaven, which is the highest. that is the most pragmatic religion.
also free hot dogs
hmm right. the church of 'do whatever the f*** you want' I would definitely subscribe to.
Lol
It's possible that an existing God would send you to hell for believing the wrong thing, but is cool with you believing they don't exist, or believing nothing at all. It also assumes that God is good, and that we actually want to go to heaven to be with Him. It's possible that he's malevolent (if you've read much of the Old Testament, it wouldn't take much convincing :P), and that we're better off away from him.
Is there anything good about Pascal's Wager?
It's a good wager if he's right I suppose.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!