Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Proof help? http://imgur.com/bqFCa

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So first step of mathematical induction is show the first case is true, so i plug in 1 for i on the left side and n on the right side:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol that's from reddit

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sum_{1}^{i=1}(1)2^{(1)}=\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Whats from reddit?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So above, on the left i have 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

on the right....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's the sum up to n + 1, not n

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[(1)2^{((1)+2)}+2 = 2^{3}+2 = 10\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ strobe, so i am supposed to plug in a 2 instead of a 1?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's the sum of the LHS subbed with 1 and 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

LHS?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

left hand side

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok so the RHS is right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sum_{i = 2}^{2} = 2(2)^{2} = 8\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so add that to the first summation and i get 10 on the LHS

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so 10 = 10 is true

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is that correct?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok, thanks, ill see if I can finish the rest from there :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Good luck!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

after step one (show p(1) is true: step 2 is assume p(k) is true and then show p(k) implies p(k+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Cant quite see how i can make that happen at the moment, heres what I have:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[p(k) : \sum_{i=1}^{k+1}i2^{i} = k2^{k+2}+2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[p(k+1): \sum_{i=1}^{k+2}i2^{i}=(k+1)2^{k+3}+2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

RHS simplifies to \[k2^{k+3}+2^{k+3}+2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So now I need to add something to p(k) to make it match p(k+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and if after adding that to p(k) the RHS of p(k) = the RHS of p(k+1), that is sufficient proof

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I wouldn't bother expanding the RHS. I would expand the LHS, then put it in terms of p(k) + something, replace p(k) with the LHS, then rearrange that result so it looks like the LHS of p(k+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[p(k)+(k+1)2^{k+1}: \sum_{i=1}^{k+1}i2^{i}+(k+1)2^{k+1}=k2^{k+2}+2+(k+1)2^{k+1}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm, i was always taught to modify add to p(k) then modify p(k)+ whateverRHS to make it the same as RHS of p(k+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This is so freakin complicated

OpenStudy (anonymous):

"I would calculate the RHS for k + 1 and then leave it alone. Then try and change the LHS to the same form as the RHS but substituting in the the RHS of p(k) into the LHS."

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So first I should calculate the right hand side of p(k+1)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or of p(k)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

p(k+1), but dont expand or simplify it, leave it as it is. This is what you're aiming for with the LHS.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the LHS of p(k+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok so,

OpenStudy (anonymous):

RHS of p(k+1): \[(k+1)2^{(k+1)+2}+2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isnt much calculation to do really, just plug in

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Then I want to make LHS of P(k+1) the same as that:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

RHS of p(k+1): \[\sum_{i=1}^{(k+1)+1}i2^{i}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

*LHS rather

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yup, so that equals the LHS of p(k) + something, find that something

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So I should expand the LHS of p(k+1) first?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Expand so it looks like LHS of p(k) + something

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I would need to add (k+1)2^(k+1) to LHS of p(k) for them to be equal

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I just have to show that...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so LHS p(k+1) = LHS p(k) + (k+2)2^(k+2) (you almost got it) but we know LHS = RHS of p(k), so substitute the LHS with the RHS

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[(p(k)LHS)+(k+1)2 ^{k+1}-> (k2^{k+2}+2)+(k+1)2 ^{k+1}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The substitution into (p(k)LHS) is p(k)RHS

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Now I need to make that = the RHS or p(k+1)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If so, that's the method I am familiar with

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yup, you'll find it all factorises nicely

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok, I must have bliped up somewhere before then, cause the Q i asked making the sides equal was my next step from here attempted

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'll try it here

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so im trying to make \[(k2^{k+2}+2)+(k+1)2^{k+1} = (k+1)2^{(k+1)+2}+2 \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

expanding everything out isnt the way to go?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it is the way to go?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

p(k): \[k2^{k}4+2^{k}2+4\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im not seeing it :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Clearly, im totally lost

OpenStudy (phi):

You have to be very careful with the indices with this problem. We can show the expression works for n=1. Now assume it is true for n=m. Can we show it is true for m+1?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thats what i tried to show

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Did i make an arithmetic error somewhere or is my methodology wrong or what

OpenStudy (phi):

\[\sum_{i=1}^{m+2}i2^i= \sum_{i=1}^{m+1}i2^i + (m+2)w^{m+2}\]

OpenStudy (phi):

not sure where you went wrong. See how we start: We increased m by 1, and then break the sum into two parts.

OpenStudy (phi):

the first sum on the right hand side "works" because we assume it works for n=m. so we can replace it with \[ m 2^{m+2} +2 \]

OpenStudy (phi):

that "w" in the first formula is a 2 ! \[ \sum_{i=1}^{m+2}i2^i= \sum_{i=1}^{m+1}i2^i + (m+2)2^{m+2}\] \[ = 2+ m 2^{m+2} +(m+2)2^{m+2} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so now I need to set that equal to the right hand side of m+1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or make it equal that at least

OpenStudy (phi):

I'm still working on it. we want the right hand side equal to what the formula says if we use n= m+1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

RHS of m+1:\[(m+1)2^{m+3}+2 \]

OpenStudy (phi):

that "w" in the first formula is a 2 ! \[ \sum_{i=1}^{m+2}i2^i= \sum_{i=1}^{m+1}i2^i + (m+2)2^{m+2}\] \[ = 2+ m 2^{m+2} +(m+2)2^{m+2} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right we need to make that equal what i just typed up right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If so, that is this: http://imgur.com/P8Tnf

OpenStudy (phi):

yes and I believe they are.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Just with m

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isnt it or am i missing something?

OpenStudy (phi):

we have m+2 now, you have k+1

OpenStudy (phi):

very close, but not close enough!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok i must have messed that up somewhere

OpenStudy (phi):

Do you see how to get the "new" version? (with m+2), it's the next term we are adding, with i= (m+2)

OpenStudy (phi):

It's confusing because we go to n+1 instead of n, so going up one term means n+2. Anyways... can you simplify what we have?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yea, so confusing!

OpenStudy (phi):

multiply out (m+2) 2^(m+2)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

making it m made it less tho

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lets see

OpenStudy (phi):

we get \[ 2+ m 2^{m+2}+m2^{m+2} + 2^{m+3} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

on LHS right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats not the same tho

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats \[2+2m ^{m+2}+2^{m+3}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

on the LHS

OpenStudy (phi):

add the two m2^(m+2) to get m*2*2^(m+2) = m*2^(m+3)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

RHS is \[2+m2^{m+3}+2^{m+3}+2\]

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!