truth tables ick
ok not tables, equivalences. what could be more tedious?
this represents 3 hours of work, including research on how to make tables look decent in latex
you have repeated the rows in "Associative laws"
if you find a typo please let me know
bless you so i have!
fixed it, thanks.
any more?
also the "Distributive laws" look like they have something wrong somewhere? also - it might be better to either call then ALL "X laws" or "X law" - you currently have a mixture
yes i seen the repeats so far
"Equivalences involving condtionals" I am not too hot on - so hopefully someone else can check them. but u do have a spelling error in "condtionals"
hey satellite what book are you using for this class?
man this was as mess!
i wish i could give you 10 medals (or a beer)
I'm surprised you can still ride straight after typing all that up :-)
I'll take a beer any day :-D
i can't really see straight. and most of this is so freaking obvious i can't imagine why you would need it
but i think i cleaned it up hard part was making the tables
It may be obvious to you but I bet its going to prove invaluable to someone out there :-)
@myininaya , rosen edition 7
thanks again. i will look one more time and see if there are any more errors, but i think i will wait until tomorrow to do it, because all these p's and q's land and lors look alike to me \[\lnot (p \land q)\equiv \text{pain in my buttocks}\]
geniuses rarely recognise the true value of their work :D
\[\color{pink}{\text{blush}}\]
can't wait to get out of this section and in to something that i like show up these smarty pants computer science types who want to use 0 and 1 and schiffer strokes
:D LOL!
satellite i think it looks fine now that is a lot of biconditionals though i don't know if i want to go through each one to see if it true or not
is this for a test they are doing?
can you share source codes for decent looking tables? :D
he will only share it with me :p
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!