Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Help with solving integrals

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I basically would like to understand how my book solved thisintegral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Like they totally ignored a negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

du=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

whoops d(theta)=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sorry there is some kind of bug. It is really all the same document

OpenStudy (anonymous):

shldnt the answer be -(4-(theta))^-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no the book is right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=How+to+solve+integrals

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so like how did they ignore the negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

like if u check the answer you wont get the same integral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Th eintegral will be negative instead of poitive

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let \[u=4-\theta \] then \[\frac{du}{d\theta} = -1\] so \[d\theta = -du\] and hence our integral becomes, upon changing the limits, \[\lim_{a\rightarrow4^{+}}\left(-\displaystyle\int_{4-a}^{-2}u^{-2}du \right) = \lim_{a\rightarrow4^{+}} \left[-(-u^{-1})\right]^{-2}_{4-a} = \lim_{a\rightarrow4^{+}}u^{-1} \vert_{4-a}^{-2} = \lim_{a\rightarrow4^{+}}\left(\frac{1}{-2} - \frac{1}{4-a}\right)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait i am just gonna process this

OpenStudy (anonymous):

alright i get it but what i dont get is why u changed the bounds

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I would have done it differently

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I used the substitution \[u=4-\theta\] and to find the new bounds, i.e. the ones for the integral in terms of u, one must substitute the old bounds into the theta position i.e. the first bound is \[4-(6) = -2\] and the second is \[4-(a) = 4-a\] in both cases, we use the equation \[u=4-\theta\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok Thanks :D I got it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yup i got it thanks for ur help

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In fact, substitution doesn't change anything about the integral really, it's still the same integral, just expressed differently. If we rearrange to get \[\theta = 4-u\] and then continue from here: \[...=\lim_{a\rightarrow 4^{+}}u^{-1}\vert_{4-a}^{-2}\] we see that the bounds may be changed via:\[4-(-2) = 6\] and \[4-(4-a) = a\] now we simply sub back \[u=4-\theta \] to arrive at the same thing your book had in the second to last step: \[=\lim_{a\rightarrow 4^{+}}(4-\theta )^{-1}\vert^{6}_{a}\] so really, the true 'identity' of this integral is unchaged under the substitution - you can uncover it back!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ya that is the way i did it

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!