OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which of these descriptions would NOT guarantee that the figure was kite? A quadrilateral with perpendicular diagonals A quadrilateral with one diagonal that bisects opposite angles and another diagonal that does not bisect opposite angles A quadrilateral with perpendicular diagonals, only one of which bisects the other A quadrilateral with exactly two distinct pairs of congruent adjacent sides

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

someone answer, plz!

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

A quadrilateral with perpendicular diagonals

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am not sure (yet)

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

no even i think its right!!.. shouldn't be perpendicular.. thats why they usually make an arch!

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think its the first option too - a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals )if my memory serves me right)

5 years ago
OpenStudy (aroub):

^ Yup :)

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, but a kite is a quadrilateral if it has two pair of equal and adjacent sides isn't?

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

it's the second one

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

so a kite can become a rhombus.

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

or a rhombus is a special kind of kite??

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, All rhombus are kites but not all kites are rhombus.

5 years ago
OpenStudy (anonymous):

right

5 years ago