attachment
Not done
1. Seg ST is parallel to Seg RQ 2. < TSR is congruent to < PRO
3. Seg SR is congruent to Seg RP 4. Tri SRT is congruent to Tri RPQ 5. Seg ST is congruent to Seg RQ
Hey, I think something has gone wrong in this proof. We may be missing a pair of angles. See what you think.
Wait, how is angle TSR congruent to PRO?
Step 3.5 <SRT is congruent to < RPQ
1. Given 2. If two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, corresponding angles are congruent. (This is hard to see - I will draw a picture in a few minutes.) 3. Given 3.5 Given 4.ASA Postulate 5. CPCTC
|dw:1329286365265:dw| Look at just these 3 lines and ignore the others to see the two parallel lines that are cut by transversal forming congruet corresponding angles SRT and RPQ which make up one pair of congruent angles in the two triangles. Do you see them?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!