Question

Natalie studied the properties of a square and a rhombus and concluded that a square can be called a rhombus but a rhombus cannot be called a square. Which statement supports her conclusion?

The sides in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.

The diagonals in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.

The opposite sides in a square must be parallel unlike in a rhombus.

The diagonals in a square must be perpendicular unlike in a rhombus.

Answer 1

The diagonals in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus