Natalie studied the properties of a square and a rhombus and concluded that a square can be called a rhombus but a rhombus cannot be called a square. Which statement supports her conclusion?
Answer

The sides in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.

The diagonals in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.

The opposite sides in a square must be parallel unlike in a rhombus.

The diagonals in a square must be perpendicular unlike in a rhombus.

Question

Natalie studied the properties of a square and a rhombus and concluded that a square can be called a rhombus but a rhombus cannot be called a square. Which statement supports her conclusion?
Answer
		
The sides in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.
		
The diagonals in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.
		
The opposite sides in a square must be parallel unlike in a rhombus.
		
The diagonals in a square must be perpendicular unlike in a rhombus.

cwrw238 · Answer

b

cwrw238 · Answer

b

anonymous · Answer

thank you p.s nice cat

cwrw238 · Answer

yw - yea she's  great

cwrw238 · Answer

she loves people but hates other cats

anonymous · Answer

oh thats nice..... :)could you help with this one also please
A lawn has four sides. There are brick laid paths along the diagonals of the lawn. One path is longer than the other. The paths bisect each other. What is the shape of the lawn? square 
rectangle 
trapezoid 
parallelogram
  the shapes always get me :P

cwrw238 · Answer

right - i'll have to think about this one

cwrw238 · Answer

iys not a square or rectangle the diagonals are same length
a trapezium - no 
must be a parallelogram

anonymous · Answer

thank you cat chick much appreciated.  :D

cwrw238 · Answer

yw