Question

Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table.
Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not?

~(p ∧ q) and (p ∨ ~q)

Answer 1

The only way they would be logically equivalent is if they have the same truth values.

Answer 2

But do you know what the missing rows would be?

Answer 3

Nope, I'm not an expert on missing rows, but ~p has to be one of them

Answer 4

Oh okay thanks :)

Answer 5

These two statements do not form a biconditional.

~ ( p /\ q) <--> ~p v ~q