lim ( (x)/(x-1) - [(1) / (lnx)] ) x->1
i think you have to subtract first
may you please rewrite :D
\[\lim_{x\to 1^+}\frac{x\ln(x)-(x-1)}{(x-1)\ln(x)}\]
\[\lim_{x\to 1^+}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{(x-1)\ln(x)}\]
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} ( \frac{x}{x-1} - \frac{1}{lnx} )\]
sorry for the confusion
it's a L'H problem
got it subtract first, then probably l'hopital
so if i plug in 1 for x i get 0/0. so... then what do i do exactly?
i'm suppose to take use L'H, but it's in a weird looking form for that
remember this is the same as \[(\lim_{x \rightarrow 1}x/x-1)-(\lim_{x \rightarrow 1}1/lnx)\] \[(\lim_{x \rightarrow 1}1/1)-(\lim_{x \rightarrow 1}0/1/x)\] then we get 1-0=1 answer is one, sorry my first answer was wrong
oh no
answer is 1/2
\[\lim{x\to 1^+}\frac{1}{\ln(x)}=\infty\] you cannot take the limits separately like that
start with \[\lim_{x\to 1^+}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{(x-1)\ln(x)}=\lim_{x\to 1^+}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{x\ln(x)-\ln(x)}\] then use l'hopital take the derivative top and bottom separately
but \[\lim_{x \rightarrow a}f(x)-g(x)=\lim_{x \rightarrow a}f(x)-\lim_{x \rightarrow a}g(x)\] right?
derivative of the numerator simplifies to \(\ln(x)\) @anonymoustwo44 yes, but both of those limits are infinity, so you are in the form \(\infty-\infty\) so you have to do more work
what you wrote is true assuming the limits are finite
@satellite73 ah ok ok
btw there is no + on the 1
ok
i didn't follow what you did :(
i'm looking at x/x-1
in any case if you take the derivative top and bottom separately you get \[\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(x)+1-\frac{1}{x}}\] which is still in the form \(\frac{0}{0}\) so you have to do it one more time
take the derivative top and bottom again you get \[\frac{\frac{1}{x}}{\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}}\] now replace x by 1 and get \[\frac{1}{2}\]
it's the minus between the fractions i dont know how to deal with...
back up to the first step
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} ( \frac{x}{x-1} - \frac{1}{\ln(x)} )=\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{(x-1)\ln(x)}=\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{x\ln(x)-\ln(x)}\] this step is pure algebra, just subtraction
next step is take the derivative top and bottom you get \[\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(x)+1-\frac{1}{x}}\]
try replacing x by 1 and you see that you get \(\frac{0}{0}\)
what's happening in that first step
this one \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} ( \frac{x}{x-1} - \frac{1}{\ln(x)} )=\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{(x-1)\ln(x)}=\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{x\ln(x)-\ln(x)}\]??
yes.. after the first =
i know it's algebra.. that's my problem :(
that is algebra \[\frac{a}{b}-\frac{c}{d}=\frac{ad-bc}{bc}\]
i think you mean over bd
yes right
multiply the two denominators together to get \[(x-1)\ln(x)=x\ln(x)-\ln(x)\] for our denominator
numerator is \[x\ln(x)-(x-1)=x\ln(x)-x+1\]
ok with ya
so that gives \[\frac{x\ln(x)-x+1}{x\ln(x)-\ln(x)}\] right ?
yes
now we want to replace x by 1 but we cannot because we will get \(\frac{0}{0}\)
yes
so we use l'hopital's rule and take the derivative of the top and bottom. that will give \[\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(x)+1-\frac{1}{x}}\]
we again try to replace x by 1 and again we get \(\frac{0}{0}\)
we did product rule in numerator, right?
well both i guess
so we have to use l'hopital one more time this time we get \[\frac{\frac{1}{x}}{\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}}\]
yes product rule in numerator and denominator to find the derivative of \(x\ln(x)\)
kk
then that's 1/2... got it. shesh!
btw, how do you type out the numbers so fast? it takes me forever to use that thing
i am not using the equation editor
what's your secret
i am typing in latex
so for example if i want \[\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(x)+1-\frac{1}{x}}\] i type in \lim_{x\to 1}\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(x)+1-\frac{1}{x}}
by hand? good grief charlie brown
i started answering questions here to practice my latex almost a year ago, and know i am getting better at it, but i got hooked on answering qustions you enclose the code by first typing "\["
and end it with "\]" try it if you like if you want to see the code for anything written, right click on it and select "view latex"
why would you want to get good at latex, is that a valued skill anywhere?
you can try for example \int_0^{\infty}e^{-x}dx and see what you get
no it is only good for type setting
it is the way one writes math, nothing further
/[\int_0^{\infty}e^{-x}dx]
oops
oh well i'll work on it.. ty for the help!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!