Why was nonviolent non-cooperation more effective than violent rebellion?
A. The British army was more powerful than Indian forces.
B. The British could not hope to contain millions of civil resisters.
C. Gandhi was counting on the basic decency of the British by not using violence.
D. All of the above

Question

Why was nonviolent non-cooperation more effective than violent rebellion?
A.  The British army was more powerful than Indian forces. 
B.  The British could not hope to contain millions of civil resisters. 
C.  Gandhi was counting on the basic decency of the British by not using violence. 
D.  All of the above

anonymous · Answer

I say a because the british troops at that time were the best in the world

anonymous · Answer

D All of the above. 

The Brits where stronger, yet if all of India had resisted (which they did) they would not be able to win, and Ghandi was a nice man, and he believes when your nice to people they are nice back, eventually.

anonymous · Answer

sooo, I think it would be D?

anonymous · Answer

Yes sir.

anonymous · Answer

that would be ma'am!  :)
Thank y'all!!!

anonymous · Answer

@JustCurious excusez-moi madame!