In choosing a gaussian surface for a solid sphere you choose a spherical chell around the sphere because E is same at all points on it.But why is it so?i mean it is not like a hollow sphere where all points are equidistant.In a solid sphere each point is at a different distance from each point of the gaussian surface
could you please add a picture ... i usually misinterpret sentences??
|dw:1334085547429:dw| Electric field is not the same at both these points.
you mean at r1 and r2 ??
Yep the outer spherical shell is what we use as a gaussian surface right?E is not same at all points on it
of course E is a vector field.
I meant the magnitude.Remember in Gauss law you choose gaussian surfaces such that E comes out of the integral
yes,i know i kinda remember that.
So here magnitude of E is not the same right on the gaussian surface because the points are not equidistant
usually the charge in solid sphere behave as it comes from a single point (it is because the these forces and field are vector component and the form the net resultant) ... so we choose Gaussian surface in such a way that it is symmetric ... so it will be equal.
Ok Ill think of it.I don't know why I am getting so confused
you know electric dipole??
Yes
it produces same effect as single charge
Show me how to think of a charge distribution.Visualising point charges is quite easy.But when it gets to charge distributions I am having trouble picturing it
I mean electric dipole is two charges, but it is equivalent to putting a single charge at some point.
|dw:1334086478938:dw|
If there's a spherical charged ball, then the top charges repel to bottom forward, and bottom charges repel to up forward, but at the end it moves forward, the up and bottom components cancel out each other.
Yeah
|dw:1334086696608:dw| instead of that, it's equivalent to putting all charges on single point.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!