Which of the following possible values of k is NOT consistent if y = f (x) is continuous, monotonic, and concave down for all values of x? 0.5, -2, 0, 1, or 6?
I am having issues understanding the wording on some the question on my review, and I just don't get the question.
Are you sure that is all of the question? They didn't say anything about k?
I know! That is why I am so confused. :/ Wouldn't the answer hinge on what /kind/ of function this was, and why role k played in said function? This is all that's listed in the question though so I wasn't sure what to do...
I'm thinking about just saying -2 because it is the only negative value listed and I imagine that it would affect the concavity of whatever function this is, especially since all the other values are positive. Do you think that's what I should answer?
My guess is that f(x) = k*g(x) for some other function g(x) Since f is monotonic over the entire domain, then f is either always increasing or decreasing over the entire domain. But if k = 0, then f(x) = 0 for all x over the domain...which wouldn't make it monotonic at all.
So k = 0 is your answer
So basically (if we assume that the function you're using is what they meant), if k=0 it would just be a line, neither decreasing or increasing?
It'd be a horizontal line y = 0, which is basically the x-axis, which is neither increasing nor decreasing. So it's not a monotonic function.
I suppose that would also make it neither concave up nor down, so that must be the answer. Thank you!
Of course, this is all hinged on the assumption that we're talking about something like f(x) = k*g(x)
Yes if k = 0, then it's second derivative is also zero, meaning that it's neither concave up or down.
Thanks, if by chance that isnt the function, I think I have a good argument since the question was so vague.
Good point, that's what I'd go with too (unless they're referencing some other part/problem in your book).
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!