Seems easy im just to dumb to know....
I hated this stuff in school, consequently I don't remember it Sorrys
np
I still have a final after this x(
Good luck!
thanks
@zepp sorry to bother you again :P
Could you give me a hint as to how i am suppose to know what comes next xD?
@ash2326
Hey zepp you there?
Could the next one be given-ny is congruent to my?
I was aft for a while, sorry about that, looking at the question right now :)
Ok np ^^
Given-segment NY congruent to segment MY?
Nvm that's the first one...
http://puu.sh/xJUW At the first glance, he's try to prove the that the red triangle is congruent to the green triangle.
oh i c
I don't see what we can put in this blank :|
i know right it's almost impossible to try and see what the person who wrote this was trying to prove i mean there are many ways to prove this right? Or is there only one way?
@AccessDenied has the solution!
It's a really subtle property you want to show before you add the angle XYZ to both the congruent angles. It's essentially the same property you used in the previous one with the two similar triangles, with that <EDF. D:
What was that property called again xD? one sec
We use reflective?
Yes! :D
:D
Think this way: A = A (Reflective) A | A Reflecting like a mirror!
How would we show that xD?
so z=x?
nyz and xyz?
Since MYX and NYX are congruent, MYX + XYZ = NYZ + XYZ From this, we know that if MYX = NYX and MYX + XYZ = NYZ + XYZ Then XYZ and XYZ are necessary congruent, right?
ya
Well, that's the very subtle thing that @AccessDenied is talking about, you have to state this angle is congruent to itself before adding things to it.
oh ok
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!