A brewery's filling machine is adjusted to fill bottles with a mean of 32.1 oz. of ale and a variance of 0.006. Periodically, a bottle is checked and the amount of ale noted. (a) Assuming the amount of fill is normally distributed, what is the probability that the next randomly checked bottle contains more than 32.25 oz? (Give your answer correct to four decimal places.) (b) Let's say you buy 94 bottles of this ale for a party. How many bottles would you expect to find containing more than 32.25 oz. of ale? (Round your answer up to the nearest whole number.) bottles
@amistre64 help here
... so i get the novels lol
haha sorry i can not figure out how to do this at all. :(
once the words are sorted thru, the rest is formulaic i believe
mean of 32.1 variance of 0.006 prob more than 32.25
what methods are you able to use? ti83 calculator, or ztable?
i use the ti-84 calculator.
then this is going to be simple
haha i cant figure out where to type it all in at. i keep getting zero as the answer.
2nd, VARS should get you to the distribution functions pick normalCDF as your function
okay
you are going to enter 4 parameters (low,high,mean,sd) since we want greater then 32.25; our low is going to be 32.23 our high has no stopping value so we need to input an arbitrary large number; 9999 is the usual the means is given and the sd is the sqrt variance
is it really that simple?! lol. thanks so much :)
your welcome, and yes; its that simple ... at least for a)
b is easy once you have the prob from a what is 94*prob from a
that wasnt right? and then wen i tried to do it again it gave me zero as the asnwer again?
what value do you have as the sd?
o wait i was using variance, how do i do sd?
wait got it lol.
cool
still was wrong wen i entered it. that was my last chance too. so how do u do b?
b is using the probability from a, and multiplying it by 94
you have to round it to 4 decies; make sure your rounding is good. is the program expecting you to use a ztable perhaps?
o okay. well if i didnt find the right probability what should i do?
yea i think my rounding was off for the sd
if it gives you a new problem, lets work with those values also, if your using a mathlab type program, there should be a "solve similar" option to make sure we are conforming to its programming
if it gave you the correct answer it wants for a, then use that to multiply by 94 (we want the percentage of bottles out of 94)
it doensnt give the correct answer. i tried to do it again and multiply it by 94 but that was wrong for part b. it doesnt give u more practice problems tho.
how do u use a ztable? c if u tried it and c what u get.
z tables are less accurate than a calculator, so if its expecting a ztable result it might consider the calc answer as off.
do you have a ztable handy?
o but no i dont is there one online?
there are lots online yes http://lilt.ilstu.edu/dasacke/eco148/ztable.htm heres one that pops up form the google
we need to determine the zvalue of 32.25; to do that, we can use the formula z = (x-mean)/sd ; where sd = sqrt(var) z = (32.25-32.1)/sqrt(.006)
i got 1.9365?
lets say that is: z = 1.94 split that up into 1.9 and .04 we use the table by finding 1.9 on the left side; and .04 on the top and seeing where they meet up at in the feild
i got .9738?
yes now we have to know that the table we are using is giving us the value of all the stuff that is LESS THAN 32.25 the whole thing is equal to 1, so we need to find the rest of it 1 - .9738 is going to be the stuff the is GREATER THAN 32.25
so its .0262?
yes, and i hope you see why we had to flip it. 1.0000 - .9738 --------- .0262 should be it; is that close to what you had with the calculator?
no i was getting .0466 lol so now i just multiply that by 94?
the probability is also a percentage; it tells us that: 2.62 % of the stuff falls within our details
if we have a total of 94, we should expect 2.62% of them to fall within our expectations
so to get B would u multiply by .0262 * 94?
your in stats, you should know how to find a percentage of a total by now :) but yes
haha yes i got that. thanks so much :)
does it like our answer tho?
nope still wrong and that was my last chance. no biggie thanks tho.
did you rnd your answer up to the nearest while number?
*whole number
yea it should have been 2 but it said it was wroing lol.
94*.0262 = 2.4628; rnds up to 3
well dang it thats why. i thought u would take the .4 and that doesnt round up.
think of it this way you have 2 wholes; and part of another one we dont want a value that is less than what is expected, and we dont get partial bottles we would need to move UP to 3 to cover the extra more than 2
okay yea true dang it. o well.
:) good luck
thanks so much.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!