Where did I make the mistake? Suppose you prove the identity cot theta = csc theta/sec theta by working only on the write side of the equation. What would the final step look like? I only ask this because I had put; cot theta = 1/tan theta (since the reciprocal equals cot theta) but it was marked as inccorect. Would the final step just by cot theta = cot theta?
You know, it helps when you reduce *everything* to sines and cosines I suggest you give that a try
Okay, hold on
I'm just a little confused because when I write the reciprocal identity for csc theta, it becomes a fraciton on top of another fraction. It that okay when solving for identities?
Of course, whenever you get a fraction on top of the other, you can express them as one *simpler* fraction. Do you know how?
I'm afraid not :(
Well, that's why I'm here ;) When you get a fraction on top of another, say (a/b) / (c/d) you take the top fraction, and multiply it to the *reciprocal* of the bottom fraction (a/b) * (d/c) Can you take it from here and apply it to your problem? :)
Right now, I have cot theta = (1/sin theta) / (1/cos theta), so I use the reciprocal of 1/cos theta and get theta? So it'd be cot theta = (1/sin theta) / cos theta? (:
I thought you were only working on the right side?
I ment * and get cos theta.
with csc theta / sec theta
Yes
Sorry Lol
ok, so csc = 1/sin, right? (I'll no longer put the theta)
what's sec?
Yes, and alrighty
You get it now? ;)
sec is 1/cos
A little more (:
that's right, so... it boils down to (1/sin) / (1/cos) now apply what I showed you about complex fractions
So if I apply what you showed about the complex fractions, would it look like this? (1/sin) / (cos) ? I'm sorry if It's taking me a minute to grasp this.
ok, remember (a/b) / (c/d) = (a/b) * (d/c) just substitute ;)
Ooohh, okay, didn't see the multiplication there (: Lol
So, can you do it?
Well, I have (1/sin) * cos but I'm not sure what follows...
Would it become tangent?
(1/sin) * (cos/1) = just multiply their numerators and denominators and you should come to an epiphany :D
Ooooh, cotangnet? Because it'll be cos/sin, right?
And that proves the identity, right? (:
That's right Good job :)
Thank you! I love how you made me think! Some people just give the answers and it doesn't help for future problems (: I appreciate your help!
Thanks, I learned my lesson :) Uhh, it does help to try to reduce everything (if you can/want) to sines and cosines when proving identities
That's what my textbook said, but I didn't know what it really ment until now (: Thanks again!
No problem =D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!