The figure below shows a rectangle ABCD having diagonals AC and DB. A rectangle ABCD is shown with diagonals AC and BD. Zinnia wrote the following proof to show that the diagonals of rectangle ABCD are congruent. Zinnia’s proof: Statement 1: In triangle ADC and BCD, AD = BC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent) Statement 2: Angle ADC = Angle BCD (angles of a rectangle are 90°) Statement 3: DC = DC (reflexive property of equality) Statement 4: Triangle ADC and BCD are congruent (by ASA postulate) Statement 5: AC = BD (by CPCTC) Which statement in Zinnia’s proof has an
@Ledah @rebeccaskell94 can you guys pleaseee help?
Da frappe? o_o
:(
I do not know, sir.
Thanks anyway mayum:)
What was the very last part supposed to say? You end with "Which statement in Zinnia’s proof has an "
an error
I believe that would be statement 4 then. It relies on the ASA postulate. This is not the postulate you want to use. What do you think the correct postulate is?
Im not sure:/
Look at this diagram. It may help you. |dw:1340312542316:dw|Can you make a guess now?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!