Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

The figure below shows a rectangle ABCD having diagonals AC and DB. A rectangle ABCD is shown with diagonals AC and BD. Zinnia wrote the following proof to show that the diagonals of rectangle ABCD are congruent. Zinnia’s proof: Statement 1: In triangle ADC and BCD, AD = BC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent) Statement 2: Angle ADC = Angle BCD (angles of a rectangle are 90°) Statement 3: DC = DC (reflexive property of equality) Statement 4: Triangle ADC and BCD are congruent (by ASA postulate) Statement 5: AC = BD (by CPCTC) Which statement in Zinnia’s proof has an

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Ledah @rebeccaskell94 can you guys pleaseee help?

OpenStudy (ledah):

Da frappe? o_o

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:(

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I do not know, sir.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks anyway mayum:)

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

What was the very last part supposed to say? You end with "Which statement in Zinnia’s proof has an "

OpenStudy (anonymous):

an error

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

I believe that would be statement 4 then. It relies on the ASA postulate. This is not the postulate you want to use. What do you think the correct postulate is?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im not sure:/

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Look at this diagram. It may help you. |dw:1340312542316:dw|Can you make a guess now?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!