Partial fractions...?
decomposition?
yes, undoing a fraction into its baser parts
\[\int\limits\limits \frac{1}{16x^2 -1} dx\]
16x^2 - 1 is a diff of squares
(4x+1)(4x-1)
Well I'm konfused how exactly they went from the x^2-5x+6 to (x-5/2^2) and (1/2)^2?
looks like they completed a square to get that
oh hmm...
x^2 -5x +6 x^2 -5x +5/2^2 -5/2^2 + 6 (x - 5/2)^2 -5/2^2 + 6 (x - 5/2)^2 - 1/4
wuh haha.,
that 2nd line...
5/4 - 5/4 + 6?
completing the square comes down to adding and subtracting half the square of the "x" coeff
what's the formula for that? haha.
x^2 + bx + c ; to complete the square, add zero to it b/2^2 - b/2^2
oh hmmm.
spose you take a general binomial and square it: (x+b)^2 = (x+b)(x+b) = x^2 + 2bx + b^2 notice that the end is have the middle, and squared
(2b/2)^2 = b^2
makes sense.
so, in order to complete a square; take half of the middle and square it :) but we dont want to change the original value of the problem, so we essentially add zero to the whole thing; but in a useful fashion b/2^2 - b/2^2 = 0
what you showed above wasn't the middle, but the end?
the b^2?
\[x^2 -5x +6\] \[x^2 -5x+(0) +6\] \[x^2 -5x+[(\frac{5}{2})^2-(\frac{5}{2})^2] +6\] \[[x^2 -5x+(\frac{5}{2})^2]+[-(\frac{5}{2})^2 +6]\]
im bad at keeping my variables in order :)
by convention, if we start out with x^2 + bx + c .... we add and subtract (b/2)^2 was what I was thinking about
it all makes sense tho :P
cool :)
now onto the evil problem :P
so now it's \[\int\limits \frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)} dx\]
recall that when adding fractions we like to get a common denominator
\[\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}=\frac{b+a}{ab}\]
:O?
we have the ab part already, so we need to split it up
b+a/ab huh....
\[\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}=\frac{A}{4x+1}+\frac{B}{4x-1}\] this is the usual way of decomposing a fraction
now the methods diverge; i tend to like the cover-up method
but, you could also go the usual method and try to add them back together now
Oh this crap.. I hate it :(
This is where we find a value for A and B right? with using a value for x?
yes
the cover up goes, zero one of the denoms out
x = 1/4?
and -1/4?
yes, and also -1/4
but isnt' a 0 in the denom undefined?
yes, so we ignore that one in the process
oh ok..
the one we ignore is the one we are determining
lets say x=1/4
okies
\[\frac{1}{(4(\frac{1}{4})+1)\cancel{(4(\frac{1}{4}-1))}}=\cancel{\frac{A}{4x+1}}+\frac{B}{(...)}\]
the "resolve" method is more intuitive i think
not sure i learned it like that..
but maybe i don't really recall much except that we want to single out A B C and D....
set everything else to 0 and try to find or something like that...
\[\frac{A}{4x+1}+\frac{B}{4x-1}=\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}\] \[\frac{A(4x-1)}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}+\frac{B(4x+1)}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}=\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}\] \[\frac{A(4x-1)+B(4x+1)}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}=\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}\] all things being equal, compare the tops
oh yeah I think that's how we did it...
4Ax - A + 4Bx + 1 = 1 4(A+B)x + (B-A) = 0x + 1
B-A = 1 B+A = 0 by comparing parts
B-A = 1 B+A = 0 -------- 2B = 1 B = 1/2 therefore A = -1/2
where does that b-a come from? I see the extra 'A' but what abotu that B?
in the last step of the fancy stuff, expand out the numerator A(4x-1) + B(4x-1) = 1 is what we end up with
err, one of those is a +1 :) 4Ax - A + 4Bx + B = 1
now we want to gather together our x parts and our constant parts to compare with
4Ax + 4Bx = 4(A+B)x -A + B = (B-A)
compare these to the other side of the equals sign; where we have 0x + 1
4(A+B)x = 0x when A+B = 0 (B-A) = 1 well, when B-A = 1
I gotta read up h/o haha.
im outta MtDew :)
I feel like this is super extra complicated...
in my book all we had to do was set x = to something, and then solve 1 at a time....
if you never learned the proper way to add fractions, then yes; it does seem a bit mixed up
oh, your book gives the cross out method; works fine too
there comes a point when the cross out fails tho, so youd have to finish up with this method
maybe
It just seems complicated, prob cuz my head wants to explode LOL :(
that page is the method we just did
*facepalm*
just think of it as adding fractions; cause thats all it amounts to
okies
find a common denominator ... that parts actually already done; you just got to remember how to finish the adding
After this problem I tihkn I'll leave the rest for a time when my brain doesn't want to kerplode :P
usually tames down after a half gallon of happy tracks icecream
:)
so A+B =0 and B-A = 1
in the end, yes
now its just a system of 2 eqs in 2 unknowns
hmm
Idk where we even are in this lol.
so why exactly did we solve for A+B and B-A?
becasue those are our missing numerators when we split it into 2 fractions
finding A and B amounts to determining the splited fractions that equate to the original whole thing
oh okay we got those bad boys before :P.
when we split it up I see...
yes, the whole thing amounts to finding the numerators that fit the split up
there are also finer points in regards to how it can split as well ... but fer now, this is fine
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!