Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 21 Online
OpenStudy (konradzuse):

Partial fractions...?

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

OpenStudy (amistre64):

decomposition?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, undoing a fraction into its baser parts

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

\[\int\limits\limits \frac{1}{16x^2 -1} dx\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

16x^2 - 1 is a diff of squares

OpenStudy (amistre64):

(4x+1)(4x-1)

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

Well I'm konfused how exactly they went from the x^2-5x+6 to (x-5/2^2) and (1/2)^2?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

looks like they completed a square to get that

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

oh hmm...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

x^2 -5x +6 x^2 -5x +5/2^2 -5/2^2 + 6 (x - 5/2)^2 -5/2^2 + 6 (x - 5/2)^2 - 1/4

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

wuh haha.,

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

that 2nd line...

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

5/4 - 5/4 + 6?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

completing the square comes down to adding and subtracting half the square of the "x" coeff

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

what's the formula for that? haha.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

x^2 + bx + c ; to complete the square, add zero to it b/2^2 - b/2^2

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

oh hmmm.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

spose you take a general binomial and square it: (x+b)^2 = (x+b)(x+b) = x^2 + 2bx + b^2 notice that the end is have the middle, and squared

OpenStudy (amistre64):

(2b/2)^2 = b^2

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

makes sense.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

so, in order to complete a square; take half of the middle and square it :) but we dont want to change the original value of the problem, so we essentially add zero to the whole thing; but in a useful fashion b/2^2 - b/2^2 = 0

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

what you showed above wasn't the middle, but the end?

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

the b^2?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[x^2 -5x +6\] \[x^2 -5x+(0) +6\] \[x^2 -5x+[(\frac{5}{2})^2-(\frac{5}{2})^2] +6\] \[[x^2 -5x+(\frac{5}{2})^2]+[-(\frac{5}{2})^2 +6]\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im bad at keeping my variables in order :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

by convention, if we start out with x^2 + bx + c .... we add and subtract (b/2)^2 was what I was thinking about

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

it all makes sense tho :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

cool :)

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

now onto the evil problem :P

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

so now it's \[\int\limits \frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)} dx\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

recall that when adding fractions we like to get a common denominator

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}=\frac{b+a}{ab}\]

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

:O?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we have the ab part already, so we need to split it up

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

b+a/ab huh....

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}=\frac{A}{4x+1}+\frac{B}{4x-1}\] this is the usual way of decomposing a fraction

OpenStudy (amistre64):

now the methods diverge; i tend to like the cover-up method

OpenStudy (amistre64):

but, you could also go the usual method and try to add them back together now

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

Oh this crap.. I hate it :(

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

This is where we find a value for A and B right? with using a value for x?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the cover up goes, zero one of the denoms out

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

x = 1/4?

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

and -1/4?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, and also -1/4

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

but isnt' a 0 in the denom undefined?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, so we ignore that one in the process

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

oh ok..

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the one we ignore is the one we are determining

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lets say x=1/4

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

okies

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{1}{(4(\frac{1}{4})+1)\cancel{(4(\frac{1}{4}-1))}}=\cancel{\frac{A}{4x+1}}+\frac{B}{(...)}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the "resolve" method is more intuitive i think

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

not sure i learned it like that..

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

but maybe i don't really recall much except that we want to single out A B C and D....

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

set everything else to 0 and try to find or something like that...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{A}{4x+1}+\frac{B}{4x-1}=\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}\] \[\frac{A(4x-1)}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}+\frac{B(4x+1)}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}=\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}\] \[\frac{A(4x-1)+B(4x+1)}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}=\frac{1}{(4x+1)(4x-1)}\] all things being equal, compare the tops

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

oh yeah I think that's how we did it...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

4Ax - A + 4Bx + 1 = 1 4(A+B)x + (B-A) = 0x + 1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

B-A = 1 B+A = 0 by comparing parts

OpenStudy (amistre64):

B-A = 1 B+A = 0 -------- 2B = 1 B = 1/2 therefore A = -1/2

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

where does that b-a come from? I see the extra 'A' but what abotu that B?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

in the last step of the fancy stuff, expand out the numerator A(4x-1) + B(4x-1) = 1 is what we end up with

OpenStudy (amistre64):

err, one of those is a +1 :) 4Ax - A + 4Bx + B = 1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

now we want to gather together our x parts and our constant parts to compare with

OpenStudy (amistre64):

4Ax + 4Bx = 4(A+B)x -A + B = (B-A)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

compare these to the other side of the equals sign; where we have 0x + 1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

4(A+B)x = 0x when A+B = 0 (B-A) = 1 well, when B-A = 1

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

I gotta read up h/o haha.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im outta MtDew :)

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

I feel like this is super extra complicated...

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

in my book all we had to do was set x = to something, and then solve 1 at a time....

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if you never learned the proper way to add fractions, then yes; it does seem a bit mixed up

OpenStudy (amistre64):

oh, your book gives the cross out method; works fine too

OpenStudy (amistre64):

there comes a point when the cross out fails tho, so youd have to finish up with this method

OpenStudy (amistre64):

maybe

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

It just seems complicated, prob cuz my head wants to explode LOL :(

OpenStudy (amistre64):

that page is the method we just did

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

*facepalm*

OpenStudy (amistre64):

just think of it as adding fractions; cause thats all it amounts to

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

okies

OpenStudy (amistre64):

find a common denominator ... that parts actually already done; you just got to remember how to finish the adding

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

After this problem I tihkn I'll leave the rest for a time when my brain doesn't want to kerplode :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

usually tames down after a half gallon of happy tracks icecream

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

:)

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

so A+B =0 and B-A = 1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

in the end, yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

now its just a system of 2 eqs in 2 unknowns

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

hmm

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

Idk where we even are in this lol.

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

so why exactly did we solve for A+B and B-A?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

becasue those are our missing numerators when we split it into 2 fractions

OpenStudy (amistre64):

finding A and B amounts to determining the splited fractions that equate to the original whole thing

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

oh okay we got those bad boys before :P.

OpenStudy (konradzuse):

when we split it up I see...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, the whole thing amounts to finding the numerators that fit the split up

OpenStudy (amistre64):

there are also finer points in regards to how it can split as well ... but fer now, this is fine

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!