Need help with contrapositive. See posted math notation.
\[For R \subseteq A \times A\] \[[(a,b) \in R \wedge (b,a) \in R] \implies a = b\] I need to find the contrapositive.
Contrapositive: negate both statements, change the direction of the implication.
yes, i am aware, but all the notation is confusing to me how to negate.
so a is not equal to b implies .... lost here
Can I assume there's no issue with negation of a=b?
Okay cool.
negation of (a^b) is ~a or ~b
\[(a,b) \notin R \wedge (b,a) \not R\] ?
negation of a = b is a != b
That first part reads thusly: [(a,b)∈R∧(b,a)∈R] if (a,b) is an element of R AND (b,a) is an element of R
yes. so i am thinking leave the AND as turn to not in R?
Almost, Sean. But the and sign becomes an or sign. Think about the negation of a statement like I am tall and male. That statement is false if I am short, but it's also false if I'm female. I don't have to be short AND female for it to be false. In general, negation of (a and b) is (not a or not b)
ok. so something like this:
\[a \neq b \rightarrow [(a,b) \notin R \vee (b,a) \notin R]\]
word
yussss
thanks guys. hope i can give you both good answer.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!