The wind's speed is 12 knots (6 m/s) NW at 320 degrees. I need to find the x and y components in order to find the air resistance acting on an object. can we discuss?
Maybe this will help:
yeah. I figured that out too @Shane_B .. however, the x has to be negative cause it's west.
Yep
ok. So I'm working with projectile and air resistance.
I need to show how much the wind speed reduces the speed of the ball in flight. Do you have an idea on what equation I can use?
I think I'd have to see the whole question first...then try to figure it out
a golf ball is projected at 56 degrees with an initial velocity of 8 m/s. The wind's speed is 6 m/s NW 320 degrees. situation one is asking to ignore air resistance and find the components of the displacement. There was no problem with that. Situation 2, I need to take into account the air resistance: So far, I've figured out the x and y of the wind's speed. I need to figure out by how much the displacement of the ball in flight it going to decrease, and obviously, it won't be a perfect (symmetrical) parabola after that. Am I clear?
this is a good depiction of the 1st situation
It's clear...but I'm rusty on how to account for drag. I believe you'll need the surface of the golf ball that's exposed to the wind though so you can calculate the x/y force of drag.
Since \[F_{drag}=\frac{1}{2}\rho v^2C_dA\]
should I apply this in both x and y?
Yes
so the v^2 will have to be once the the velocity of the ball in the x direction, and then in the y direction?
I have the area of the ball, where do I get the p and the Cd from?
p is the density of the air which varies with temperature of course. A quick google search is giving me: \[\rho=1.2 kg/m^3\]
Cd is the drag coefficient...I need to see what that's supposed to be.
I have the temperature, it's 41 degrees celsius.. how can I calculate the density of the air using it? density = mass/volume.. in this case I need the mass and volume of the air?
Yea...or just find a table. It's going to be about 1.25
At 41C
Conflicting information on that...gimme a few minutes to see if we can just calculate it
cool thanks
@Shane_B great help dude @Boushra Please award the server by a medal... click on best response
If you are satisified with the answer of the person ..
yeah.. he's doing great ^_^
I find a table on wikipedia saying that at 40 clesius, density = 992.2 kg/m^3
Alright, let's calculate the air density: \[d=\frac{1atm}{RT}\]Where R is the specific gas constant of dry air: 287.05 J/kg Kelvin. T is in Kelvin also. Using that formula, I'm getting 1.124 kg/m^3.
and 1atm is obviously 101,325pa :)
ok, so you're converting 41 C to K. Hold on, I'll check
\[d_a{ir}=\frac{101325pa}{287.05*(41+273.15)}=1.124kg/m^3\]
yep.. got that correct as well.
This is getting deep :P
yeah.. :) I'm loving it :) now we're left with Cd
im trying to find an equation for it
I have the equation...but it depends on the Fd! Stuck at the moment...1 equation with 2 unknowns.
oh oh! there has got to be someway..
(back to the internet!)
;)
I know it's somewhere between 0.1 and 0.3...that's a start. But it would be nice to know for sure
agreed
Ok, from what I've read, it has to be a measured value (wind tunnel)! I'd say go with 0.2 since it's in the middle.
wind tunnel?
It's a room where they blow high-speed winds over objects and calculate the air resistance. Used for cars, planes, rockets, etc.
certainly can't get hold of that ... but, where did you get 0.1 to 0.3 from if I may know?
At any rate there are tables of values for common objects like a sphere (which is 0.47). However, a golf ball is dimpled (to reduce the drag) so it's going to be lower. From what I found online it's somewhere between 0.1 and 0.3...depending on the velocity used in the formula.
I saw the 0.1 on another site...already closed that one.
perfect, it seems approximate.. it would work even if the velocity of the ball is only 6 m/s, right?
Since the 0.3 is for speeds > 54 m/s...I go with something lower but between 0.1 and 0.3. Probably 0.1 since 6m/s is nothing really.
relatively
What are you using for the exposed surface area of the ball?
um... actually I need to figure that out I guess. all I have is the diameter of the ball
42.67 mm
I looked that up...the diameter is a range but at a minimum it's 42.67mm
I got 0.00285999427 m^2 for the exposed surface are of the ball.
:)
what's the equation for that please? ^^
Well, I just used the surface area of a sphere:\[A=4\pi r^2\]Cut that in half since only half the ball is exposed to the wind...then converted it to m^2 from mm^2
Basically: \[2\pi(\frac{0.04367m}{2})^2=0.0030m^2 \space(rounded)\]
awesome!
Now I think we can actually work on the real problem :)
I guess we have everything to figure out Fd
just one question, how will i be able to use 6 m/s (winds speed) here? i don't think it can be used in this equation.. thoughts?
I think you have to add the ball's x/y speed to the wind speed and then calculate the drag from those values. It makes sense to do that because it should be additive (regardless of the -x you got way earlier).
Thinking of it this way: If I'm moving 40 mph the wind will hit me at 40mph. If the wind is blowing in my direction at 20mph, then wind will be hitting me at 60mph.
Make sense?
hold on:)
it does. so, if the ball is moving at ux and the wind is hitting it at vx , then the v of the ball is vx - ux?
which I will substitute in the formula?
For the drag formula in the x direction, it would be vx - ux...and ux is negative so it would be vx-(-ux). This makes sense to me since it's blowing against the ball...so it should be combination of both magnitudes.
ok. but it would be vy - uy, correct?
yeah, things are starting to make sense, thanks @Shane_B :) .. i think it should be easy from here?
I don't know if it gets easier :) In the y direction, when the ball is going up the wind is helping it...when it's going down, the wind is working against the ball.
the wind in the y direction I mean in that last part.
oh I didn't think of it that way.
I'm thinking we must have way-overcomplicated this. I just found this: http://www.phy.davidson.edu/stuhome/jocampbell/projectile/projectile.htm Scroll near the bottom :)
The applet itself is on the main page...having played with it yet: http://www.phy.davidson.edu/stuhome/jocampbell/projectile/projectile.ProjectileControl.html
*haven't
KE it says?! haha.. we've really complicated this
but they still use the Fd in x and y
After reading it, I'm pretty confident that page is oversimplifying it...for educational purposes. I don't see any real mistakes on what we've done so far.
I assume this question is for a class...if so, which one are you taking?
it's physics class, i'm taking it as an elective in my psych degree
We didn't even cover drag in Physics I/II/III !!!
I think this is more of a Dynamics class question.
are we able to assume that the velocity of the wind only blew when that ball was the the top of its trajectory? that way only the displacement in the x direction of the ball would reduce?
are you doing uni? which year?
I finished my EE stuff this past year...all graduated :)
I don't know if that's a safe assumption...the problem does say much about the wind or at what elevation it will come into play.
*doesn't !
well actually, we didn't cover that yet, I have an assignment on observation of underlying physics of a real world situation, taking into account air resistance. Obviously, I need to go a bit outside the book
the problem is something I came up with, I can alter in order to make things a little easier :), but I still need to apply air resistance
I think you/we are on the right track here...but I also think you have to factor in that the wind is opposing the ball on the way down. Maybe a better question would be to calculate the air resistance in 1 dimension...ie: a car :)
My guess is that you're one of the over-achiever types :)
true, but I really want to involve projectile, and since golf is my favorite sport, I would like to give this assignment the best I can
I try :)
Well, I have some stuff I need to get to....but I think you're well on your way here. Maybe someone else will come in and simplify all this in like 5 formulas :)
see you are physics problems @Shane_B
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!