Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 11 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. I) If the dog wags its tail, then the dog is not calm. II) If the dog is not calm, then the dog wags its tail. III) If the dog is calm, then the dog does not wag its tail. I, II, and III are equivalent I and II are equivalent II and III are equivalent I and III are equivalent None are equivalent

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wat do u think?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i dont no

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well, all 3 mean different things, so the last option

OpenStudy (anonymous):

try write in in symbolic form, hint: dog wags its tail is p the dog is calm is q

OpenStudy (anonymous):

none are equivalent

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so it's \[I.p\to\neg q\\ II. \neg q\to p \\III.q\to\neg p\] since by modus tollens\[p\to\neg q\Rightarrow q\to \neg p \\\therefore I\text{ imply } III\] it can be said that I equals III

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Modus Tollens: \[\frac{P\to Q,\neg Q}{\therefore \neg P}\] 1. P implies Q, and the second premise, Q , is false 2. Then it can be logically concluded that P must be false.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@black12 what do you think?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it loks good

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!