Form the inverse: If I do not mow the lawn, then the grass grows too tall. If the grass grows too tall, then I did not mow the lawn. If I mow the lawn, then the grass does not grow too tall. If the grass does not grow too tall, then I mowed the lawn. If the grass does not grow too tall, then I did not mow the lawn. If the grass grows too tall, then I mowed the lawn
Let p = "I move the lawn" and q = "Grass grows too tall" Your statement is therefore ~p => q. Now, do you know what is an inverse?
no what is that
When you have an implication, for example a=>b, then an inverse of it is ~a=>~b. Now apply this definition to the sentence I gave you.
would it b the second statement p=>q
No. Look, in our example, a is ~p and b is q. So ~a is ~~p = p and ~b is ~q, so you have p => ~q. Now just translate it into English.
Or to make it simpler: to form the inverse, you just negate both sentences and keep them in the same order.
ok so it would b the first statement once u flip it around
But you don't flip around. You just add "no" to both sentences. And double negative makes a positive.
this stuff is a little csig to figure out
confusing
Okay, so let's negate both sentences. "I don't mow the lawn" turns into "I mow the lawn" and "The grass grows too tall" turns into "The grass doesn't grow too tall". Your final answer would be then: "If I mow the lawn, the grass doesn't grow too tall".
okay
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!