\[\begin{array}{cc} \text{Find} \; \mathcal L \lbrace \phi (t) \rbrace \; \text{where} \; \phi (t) &= 1 \quad 0 < t < 2\\&=t \quad \quad \; \; t >2 \end{array}\]
uhh o.0 it looks hard is this like parametrics ? :o
this is laplace transform haha lol
Try the same here.. As you did earlier..
\[\large \implies \int\limits_{0}^{2}(e^{-st})dt + \int\limits _{2}^{\infty} (t \cdot e^{-st}) dt\]
uhh wait...i posted the wrong question...
nevermind...i'll just solve this one
You will be having problem in second integral I guess.. If no then Very Good for you..
i got something like \[\huge \left[-\frac{e^{-st}}{s}\right|_0^2 + \left[-\frac{te^{-st}}{s} - \frac{e^{-st}}{s^2}\right|_2^\infty\] is that right?
Sorry here it is t so you can solve it easily sorry.. But if it was t^{-1} then you will be having problems in evaluating this..
Let me check.
...i have no idea what you just said...
@waterineyes still here?
i got \[\huge \frac{e^{-2s} + 1}{s} + \frac{e^{-2s}}{s^2}\] can anyone check if im right?
looks right; ;p http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=inverse+laplace+%28%28e%5E%28-2s%29%2B1%29%2Fs%2Be%5E%28-2s%29%2Fs%5E2%29
so wolfram can solve laplace o.O >.<
wolfram can do al lot of things http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=blue+%2B+red
but how did you know my answer is right?
i compared your piecewise function to the graph
oh. well thanks
My internet sucked that time... So I was unable to connect...
maybe it was just OS...we never know
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!