Sketch in the argand plane: -2+4i+5.... I know how to do the argand diagram but I am confused about the +5. Any assistance is appreciated. Kind regards....
\[-2+4i+5\]
whats an argand plane?
it is a plane which has points from real and complex numbers
similar to a cartesian plane
if thats just the complex plane, then combine like terms
-2+4i+5 = 3+4i
right.. now this comes from a problem which states : show that the set of complex numbers z which satisfy |z| = |z-1+2i|
is a line in the argand plane.
|z| represents distance from the origin right?
so the first thing i did was let z=a+bi
and the did the calculations
so i was left with -2a+4b+5
I know this as the Gaussian Plane (-: Interesting actually.
But if you want to draw a complex number in the Argand Plane you need an argument then and a magnitude.
now a is the real part and b imaginary so i rewrote the term as -2 + 4i +5
you could do it with the cartesian form as well ..space....real no. goes on the hor line and imaginary on the verical
a+bi = a+bi - 1 + 2i a+bi = (a-1) +(b+2)i 0 = (a-1)-a +(b+2)i-bi 0 = -1+2i , not sure if its right, but this is what i end up with
but remember the modulus |z| so when you stick a+bi into that, you left with |a+bi| and then you have to take the sqrt of the squares of a + b
so |a+bi| = |a+bi-1+2i|
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%7Cz%7C+%3D+%7Cz-1%2B2i%7C i think the wolf agrees .... but i cant be sure lol
to solve that you have to square the terms then take sqrt
wolf agrees. but there is no imaginary part?
|z| is a distance from the origin such that |z| = sqrt(a^2+b^2) , z=a+bi
yes
as in thereom of pythagoros
what about the RHS
check this : http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%7Ca%2Bbi%7C+%3D+%7Ca%2Bbi-1%2B2i%7C
a^2+b^2 = (a-1)^2 + (b+2)^2 a^2+b^2 = a^2 -2a +1 + b^2 +4b +4 0 = -2a +1+4b +4 2a -4b = 5 looks linear to me
if we assume a convention xy plane as the rc plane; a=r, b=c
even -2a+4b+5 now a is real part, b is imaginary
b is the real coeff of the imaginary part, yes
hence the term is -2+4i+5 Should I then just add the -2 and 5 ?
b is not "the imaginary part" it is a real coefficient OF the i part
okay , that makes sense...
think of b as the y axis; and a as the x axis
the i part is just a unit measure along the "b" axis then
okay
@unseenoceans, was this question about something like this? |dw:1344366241548:dw| Discussion of complex functions ?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!