After many experiments and observations, After many experiments and observations, Jacques Charles described how gases expand Jacques Charles described how gases expand at the same rate as a change in temperature. at the same rate as a change in temperature. This observation is represented in the formula This observation is represented in the formula V100 – V0 = kV0. These findings are not the V100 – V0 = kV0. These findings are not the basis of a scientific theory because basis of a scientific theory because a. they establish a claim that can be tested and a. they establish a claim that can
After many experiments and observations, After many experiments and observations, Jacques Charles described how gases expand Jacques Charles described how gases expand at the same rate as a change in temperature. at the same rate as a change in temperature. This observation is represented in the formula This observation is represented in the formula V100 – V0 = kV0. These findings are not the V100 – V0 = kV0. These findings are not the basis of a scientific theory because basis of a scientific theory because a. they establish a claim that can be tested and a. they establish a claim that can be tested and retested by the scientific community retested by the scientific community b. they describe what happens in nature b. they describe what happens in nature without explaining why it happens without explaining why it happens c. they explain the relationship between gases c. they explain the relationship between gases and temperature based on observation and temperature based on observation d. they predict what will happen in nature d. they predict what will happen in nature without tests and supporting evidence without tests and supporting evidence
Wow is that typing with an echo? Tell me, what is a scientific theory?
Something that displays evidence
Hmm. Elaborate on that.
In what way does it "display" the evidence?
Its a theory that displays scientific observations, ones that include evidence and relevant information
Try not to use "theory" or "display" in your definition. "Theory" is what you're trying to define, and "display" is ambiguous. This is the definition I usually use: A scientific theory explains the how and why of a large set of data from numerous experiments and/or observations.
Okay well I think its B
I would agree.
Okay thanks Can you help with another question
sure.
Okay hold on one sec
stiaan Eijkman shared the Nobel Prize in Christiaan Eijkman shared the Nobel Prize in 1929 for the discovery of vitamins. Eijkman 1929 for the discovery of vitamins. Eijkman went to Java to isolate the pathogen that was went to Java to isolate the pathogen that was the cause of beriberi, an illness that appeared the cause of beriberi, an illness that appeared to be contagious as it was common in prisons to be contagious as it was common in prisons and ships crews. Eijkman noticed that and ships crews. Eijkman noticed that chickens fed a diet of white rice also suffered chickens fed a diet of white rice also suffered from a similar disorder. When the chickens from a similar disorder. When the chickens were fed a diet of red rice, the chickens quickly were fed a diet of red rice, the chickens quickly recovered. Eijkman returned to the Netherlands recovered. Eijkman returned to the Netherlands and persuaded a prison to feed the prisoners and persuaded a prison to feed the prisoners red rice, and the incident of beriberi decreased. red rice, and the incident of beriberi decreased. In what way was Eijkman's work unscientific? In what way was Eijkman's work unscie
Okay hold on one sec
? You don't want to discus Cristiaan Eijkman?
I do.
oh ok, sorry, my screen jumped weirdly.
Right so what are your initial thoughts?
Its okay mine is to
What makes an endeavor scientific or non-scientific?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!