Explain why we use f(X) instead of using"y" when solving for f(x). I understand that y= f(X) and how to solve it. The reason I am asking is that I would like to understand the mechanics of it, and how it relates to the overall solving of the problem.
you could just as well write y(x) to indicate that y is a function of x
You can flip it? O_O
f(x) itself is just a generic name to define something as a function of "x"
so basically what you are saying is, that f(x) and g(x) are both used to differentiate different "y" variables so that it doesnt get confusing.
y = f(x) reads: y is a function of x y(x) reads: y is a function of x or your reasoning is valid as well
so something that is a function means that y(x) or f(x) in this case, is affected directly by a change in "x"?
correct
so something that is f(g(x)) means that the a change in "g" because of "x" results in a corresponding change in "f" as well?
yes. think of composite functions like a box of gears; as you rotate g(x), it in turn rotates f(x) to generate the desired output
thanks. thats a good analogy. mind if i borrow it?
patent pending lol
ha.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!