Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

In a geometry class, the students were asked to write statements that are logically equivalent to the statement shown below. If a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then it is a radius. Below are the responses of four students. Which student’s response is correct?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Student 2: If a line segment is not a radius, then it joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle. Student 1: If a line segment is not a radius, then it does not join the center of a circle with a point on the circle. Student 3: If a line segment does not join the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then the line segment is a radius. Student 4: If a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then the line segment is not a radius.

Directrix (directrix):

The statement that is logically equivalent to the given statement "If a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then it is a radius" is the *contrapositive* of the given statement. What is the contrapostive of p -> q ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

student 3

Directrix (directrix):

I do not agree that student 3 is correct.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

why I need help on this

Directrix (directrix):

That is why I asked this: What is the contrapostive of p -> q ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a statement in the opposite order of an original statement with both parts negated.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok, so what student said something that looks like that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok so student 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i'm a little confused because sutdent number 1 is second in your list up there, what statement is the logical equivalent?

Directrix (directrix):

In your given statement, the following is true. P: a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle q: it is a radius The above is p-> q. The contrapositive of p->q is what you want for the logically equivalent statement. The contrapositve, as you stated in words above, is written symbolically as: ~q ->~p {Read as not q implies not p} Take the negation of: q: it is a radius and let it imply the negation of P: a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle. That is the contrapositive and it is logically equivalent to the given implication. Logically equivalent means the two statements say the same thing.

Directrix (directrix):

So, which student do you think is correct?

Directrix (directrix):

@Napervillian I'll answer your questions after those of Carlos. Please do not add confusion. Thank you.

Directrix (directrix):

@Carlos2445 Student 2 is not correct. You could get these correct every time if you would go with the contrapositive.

Directrix (directrix):

What you want is IF NOT (q: it is a radius ), then NOT ( P: a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle) @Carlos2445

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay i got student 1 cause he mentions not twice

Directrix (directrix):

Student 1, I agree. That mentioning "not" twice can be tricky. If the statement had been: If x = 4, then x^2 is not 9, then what would be the contrapositive?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if not x=4, then x^2 does not equal 9

Directrix (directrix):

No. The contrapositive would be: If x^2 does NOT not equal 9, then x does NOT = 4. Simplified: If x^2 =9, the x is not 4.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x=3

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!