Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion? The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite. All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite. The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite. The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite.
please help!!
I'm not sure what the official properties of a kite are...
me either i dont get it
ok, so we do know that a kite is adjacent and are equal in length. keep that in mind. the other possible answers are all the similarites of a kite and a rhombus. The only differnce is that a rhombus has parallel sides and a kite has its adjacent sides :)
so what would be the answer
the first one :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!