Anyone really good at Geometry? With like the Given and Prove?
Yep.... what do you need help with?
I love "I love Lucy" ! :D
and hold on
Thanks! :-)
Supply the missing reasons to complete the proof. ASA; substitution SAS; Corresponding parts of are . AAS; Corresponding parts of are . ASA; Corresponding parts of are .
I think it might be SAS but I'm not sure.
It's ASA
can you explain to me why
Yes.... Let me draw a picture it will help
and can you help me with the other 2? :)
|dw:1354658642678:dw|
Yes
tatements Reasons 1. ∠A∠E and 2. ∠ACB ∠ECD 3. ΔACB ΔECD 4. 1. Given 2. Vertical angles are congruent 3. _?_ 4. _?_
ASA; Corresponding parts of are . SAS; Corresponding parts of are . ASA; substitution AAS; Corresponding parts of are .
So do you see the order of the angle, side, and angle. That's why it's ASA
Ok: next one
Yeah, now I see it.
is this one the same as the other one?
I don't know... I just started
oh. well it's pretty similar to the other one. lol
yep, wait is there one more thing, because there's only two pairs of congruent angles and there isn't enought info to confirm that the tiangles are congruent
there's nothing missing. :/
hmmm
OK last one! c:
Supply the reasons missing from the proof shown below. ASA; Corresponding parts of are . SAS; Reflexive Property SSS; Reflexive Property SAS; Corresponding parts of are .
SAS
|dw:1354659433420:dw|
Because the order goes side, angle, and side
does that make sense?
how do I determine the second one? If it's corresponding or reflexive property?
Corresponding because you already determined that the triangles are congruent
Does that make sense? Just keep practicing and you'll get the hang of it.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!