How do you compute the line integral of a field along a parametrized curve?
i believe its\[F(r)\dot{}r' \]
it would help with more specifics to the problem :)
i can give you the problem verbatum if that would help
it would be better than me trying to guess at it, yes ;)
Compute the line integral of the field F(x, y) = ⟨2x sin y, x^2 cos y⟩ along the curve with parametrization r(t) = ⟨e^(cos t+sin t), e^(cos t-sin t)⟩, 0 ≤ t ≤ 2.
the boxes are ( ) ok
so lets start by taking the derivative of r
with respect to t?
yes, since there really is no other variables in r .. lets try it with wrt t :)
\[\Large x(t)=e^{cos t+sin t}\\ \Large y(t)= e^{cos t-sin t}\] \[\Large x'(t)=(-sint+cost)e^{cos t+sin t}\\ \Large y'(t)= (-sint-cost)e^{cos t-sin t}\] agree?
(cos t - sin t)e^(cos t + sin t), (-cos t - sin t)e^(cos t - sin t)
thats what i got
good now dot that to F and what do we get?
2sin y , -x^2sin y
oy this can get messy but with any luck it simplifies nicely if you wanna swap out the xs and ys in F first with their r part equivalents that something we will have to do eventually
<a,b> dot <c,d> = ac + bd just in case youve forgotten how to dot :)
i missread what you typed i thought you said to DO it to F
x=rcos\[x = r \cos \theta, y = r \sin \]
yes?
no, lets do it by components so its simpler to work thru given F(x,y) and the parametric r(x(t),y(t)) we want to determine the dot product of F(r) and r'; r' = (x'(t),y'(t)) so lets dot them and see if it cleans up any; recall that x = e^(cos t+sin t) and y= e^(cos t-sin t) taking the "x" component of F we have: 2x sin y replacing x and y we get 2e^(cos t+sin t) sin e^(cos t-sin t) and we determined the r' "x'" components to be:(cos t - sin t)e^(cos t + sin t) so in effect, multiply those together
ok gimme a sec........maybe more
:) i can already tell you its a pain to do without the wolf :)
ill work out the y parts and then we can add the 2 together
F, y component is: x^2 cos y x = e^(cos t+sin t) y = e^(cos t-sin t) replace xy parts in the F e^(2cos t+2sin t) cos(e^(cos t-sin t)) multiply this with the y' from the r' ... the (-cos t - sin t)e^(cos t - sin t) ( e^(2cos t+2sin t) cos(e^(cos t-sin t)))((-cos t - sin t)e^(cos t - sin t)) and the wolf gives me ... - e^(sint+3cost) cos(e^(cost-sint)) (sint+cost) http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28+e%5E%282cos+t%2B2sin+t%29+cos%28e%5E%28cos+t-sin+t%29%29%29%28%28-cos+t+-+sin+t%29e%5E%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29%29
for x i ended up with (cos t - sin t) 2e^(cos t + sin t)(sin e^(cos t - sin t)
does wolfram agree?
(2e^(cos t+sin t) sin(e^(cos t-sin t)))((cos t - sin t)e^(cos t + sin t)); close http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282e%5E%28cos+t%2Bsin+t%29++sin%28e%5E%28cos+t-sin+t%29%29%29%28%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29e%5E%28cos+t+%2B+sin+t%29%29 your 2e part needs some "2s" in it :)
its on my paper just not on my screen....oops
(cos t - sin t) 2e^(2cos t + 2sin t)(sin e^(cos t - sin t)- e^(sint+3cost) cos(e^(cost-sint)) (sint+cost) now lets see of the wolf can clean this up any ... crosses finger the alternate forms dont look any better http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2e%5E%282cos+t+%2B+2sin+t%29sin%28e%5E%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29%29%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29+-+e%5E%28sint%2B3cost%29+cos%28e%5E%28cost-sint%29%29+%28sint%2Bcost%29+ you think we can clean it up with a usubstitution? or do you feel confident enough to muddle thru it?
either or
next i need to integrate that monster correct?
yep and just in case we might have gonna astray .. we havent. that dot is good http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5B2e%5E%28cos+t%2Bsin+t%29+sin%28e%5E%28cos+t-sin+t%29%29+%2C%28e%5E%28cos+t%2Bsin+t%29%29%5E2+cos%28e%5E%28cos+t-sin+t%29%29%5D+dot+%5B%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29e%5E%28cos+t+%2B+sin+t%29%2C+%28-cos+t+-+sin+t%29e%5E%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29%5D
and in case you need to dbl chk your answer :) http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+%282e%5E%282cos+t+%2B+2sin+t%29*sin%28e%5E%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29%29*%28cos+t+-+sin+t%29+-+e%5E%28sint%2B3cost%29+*cos%28e%5E%28cost-sint%29%29+*%28sint%2Bcost%29%29%2C+t%3D0..1
thank you for your help
youre welcome. If you were expected to do this all by hand, the person who assigned it to you ought to be fired. The concepts are important to know .. not the mess
everything else that he assigned was much more simplistic. i wonder if there is a theorem to simplify this problem? if t goes from 0 to 2pi would that simplify this?
there might be some obscure thrm out there, but the ugliness is in the integral that results ... which of course a computer can do with ease
even splitting it up into its different sum parts doesnt help clean it up ... maybe a few substitutions would work out but oy!!
its just too cluttered for me to see anything doable it it :)
would it help to change it to polar coordinates?
dunno, a change doesnt necessarily equate to simpler
ok thank you for your time
good luck ;)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!